Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Flamefast CM350 update

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Charles Ping - 29 Jun 2008 14:35 GMT
This is just for the record.
Some of you may remember that I bought an ex-school Flamefast CM350
furnace from Manchester. After passng through many hands in a
transport process it arrived with me in Suffolk.
The furnace was natural gas and I wanted to run it on propane.
Flamefast supplied new jet for £24. However for anyone else doing this
I've just meausred the two jets. Small holes are difficult to measure
(for me, anyway) but the natural gas one is 0.090 mm and the propane
one is 0.065mm.

Charles
Duncan Munro - 29 Jun 2008 14:49 GMT
> This is just for the record.
> Some of you may remember that I bought an ex-school Flamefast CM350
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> (for me, anyway) but the natural gas one is 0.090 mm and the propane
> one is 0.065mm.

Charles, that sounds like very small holes indeed.  When I knocked up my
propane burner to run off 30 PSI, I ended up going with a 1.00 mm jet
size.  What gas pressure are you running?

Signature

Duncan Munro
http://www.m0kgk.co.uk/

Charles Ping - 29 Jun 2008 15:49 GMT
>> This is just for the record.
>> Some of you may remember that I bought an ex-school Flamefast CM350
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>propane burner to run off 30 PSI, I ended up going with a 1.00 mm jet
>size.  What gas pressure are you running?

Flamefast reckon 35mBar  - a hell of a lot less than 30psi
http://www.flamefast.co.uk/heat-treatment/crucible-furnaces-cm350.html

So either yours is one big old burner that will melt iron and keep
Gazprom's profits high or the Flamefast furnace is very efficient.
Possibly something in the middle.

Charles
Duncan Munro - 29 Jun 2008 17:07 GMT
>> Charles, that sounds like very small holes indeed.  When I knocked up my
>> propane burner to run off 30 PSI, I ended up going with a 1.00 mm jet
>> size.  What gas pressure are you running?

> Flamefast reckon 35mBar  - a hell of a lot less than 30psi
> http://www.flamefast.co.uk/heat-treatment/crucible-furnaces-cm350.html
>
> So either yours is one big old burner that will melt iron and keep
> Gazprom's profits high or the Flamefast furnace is very efficient.
> Possibly something in the middle.

LOL! I'll think of Chelsea buying another player every time I fire the
burner up ;-)

I had a look at the flamefast link, it shows 29000 BTU/hr or about a
quarter of the output of the burner here, but I'm still curious about
the massive difference in jet sizes.

Here's a link to play with: http://ronreil.abana.org/design2.shtml#BTU

Scroll down to "BTU calculator" and there's an excel spreadsheet you can
download which works out BTU, jet size, flow, etc.  If you key in your
jet size (it's imperial so 0.065mm is about 2.5 thou) and even with 30
PSI, there's not a lot coming out....

Signature

Duncan Munro
http://www.m0kgk.co.uk/

Charles Ping - 29 Jun 2008 17:25 GMT
>>> Charles, that sounds like very small holes indeed.  When I knocked up my
>>> propane burner to run off 30 PSI, I ended up going with a 1.00 mm jet
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>jet size (it's imperial so 0.065mm is about 2.5 thou) and even with 30
>PSI, there's not a lot coming out....

OK, so you've conclusively proved that I measured the hole wrongly!
What I'll do is search for some wire that *just* fits in the jet and
try again.

Charles
Charles Ping - 29 Jun 2008 18:49 GMT
>>>> Charles, that sounds like very small holes indeed.  When I knocked up my
>>>> propane burner to run off 30 PSI, I ended up going with a 1.00 mm jet
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>Charles

Doh!
It's imperial not metric
0.090" and 0.065"
Why didn't I spot that a the jet wasn't thinner than a human hair!

Charles
Andrew Mawson - 29 Jun 2008 19:19 GMT
> >>>> Charles, that sounds like very small holes indeed.  When I knocked up my
> >>>> propane burner to run off 30 PSI, I ended up going with a 1.00 mm jet
> >>>> size.  What gas pressure are you running?
> >>
> >>> Flamefast reckon 35mBar  - a hell of a lot less than 30psi

http://www.flamefast.co.uk/heat-treatment/crucible-furnaces-cm350.html

> >>> So either yours is one big old burner that will melt iron and keep
> >>> Gazprom's profits high or the Flamefast furnace is very efficient.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Charles

My Flamefast ceramic chip forge uses a venturi to suck the gas through
the jet. Forced air from a blower enters the venturi which ceates the
negative pressure and sucks in the gas through a special demand valve.
No blowing gives no gas so it's fail safe. However I would assume that
this set up mucks up jet size calculations as the set gas pressure on
the regulator is not the pressure difference that the jet sees. Maybe
yours is similar?

AWEM
Charles Ping - 30 Jun 2008 09:48 GMT
>My Flamefast ceramic chip forge uses a venturi to suck the gas through
>the jet. Forced air from a blower enters the venturi which ceates the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>AWEM

Andrew

The CM350 is self blown (no sniggering at the back) with no seperate
air blower. The forges do have a low pressure air blower (or at least
my one did). It *might*  muck up the jet hole size but assuming that
the fan is a blowing the same for both types of gas the ratio of jet
areas between propane and natural gas might be the same.

Charles
Duncan Munro - 29 Jun 2008 19:50 GMT
> Doh!
> It's imperial not metric
> 0.090" and 0.065"
> Why didn't I spot that a the jet wasn't thinner than a human hair!

Thank God for that, you had me scratching my head big time :-)

Signature

Duncan Munro
http://www.m0kgk.co.uk/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.