 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Models / January 2009John Bunt struggles to pay off his debts
Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal debts that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=230321097415&ssPageNam e=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=013 > Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal debts > that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. Nice drill press. If I was in the UK I would buy it and I know three people in my knife makers club who would buy it. How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? >> Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal debts >> that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs haven't > paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? Hoi Taylor. Get your tongue out. Licking bunts arse is hancoxs job! On 26 Jan, 03:55, "Andrew Taylor" <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: > > Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal debts > > that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs haven't > paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? They don't know anything Andrew, as usual my total outstanding debts are whatever leccy gas / water bills are accruing plus the monthly net access bill, and that is about it. On the other hand one Mr David Tilley still owes me the £1,000 plus costs awarded at Exeter, so in fact since then total monies owing of any form at any one time has in fact always been considerably less than total monies owed to me by scum. Fact is having met and gotten to know some of the "participants" I genuinely could not wish upon them any more horrific fate than to serve out the rest of their time on this planet as themselves. This is possibly the most *profoundly* accurate statement I have ever made on usenet. Now and again someone tells me that the bitches are still snapping at my heels, but unless someone like yourself nudges it all past filters that is all I hear of it, I guess they must truly love and miss me to keep the flame alive this long. Hope all's well for you and yours in canuckia, Gordy has pretty much screwed the pooch here so the only way for pubs with accomodation to turn a profit is to convert to bail hostels. cheers > On 26 Jan, 03:55, "Andrew Taylor" > <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > cheers He owes you f.ck all nonse boy > On 26 Jan, 03:55, "Andrew Taylor" > <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > cheers http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=230321097415&ssPageNam e=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=013 >> On 26 Jan, 03:55, "Andrew Taylor" >> <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=230321097415&ssPageNam e=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=013 pmsl - If bunt were brave enough to go near Exeter court - which he won't becuase he is sh.t scared of facing the £37 bill that he ran up while trying to defraud people - he would see that his silly little fraud against tilley was slung out. But then that was all published on the net wasn't it? Still fiddling with 12 year olds bunt? (Or younger depending on how fast they mature) eh? On 26 Jan, 03:55, "Andrew Taylor" <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: > "Yet Another Fred" <Fred1...@tiscali.net> wrote in > messagenews:497ce53d$0$3340$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs haven't > paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? They don't know anything Andrew, as usual my total outstanding debts are whatever leccy gas / water bills are accruing plus the monthly net access bill, and that is about it. On the other hand one Mr David Tilley still owes me the £1,000 plus costs awarded at Exeter, so in fact since then total monies owing of any form at any one time has in fact always been considerably less than total monies owed to me by scum. Fact is having met and gotten to know some of the "participants" I genuinely could not wish upon them any more horrific fate than to serve out the rest of their time on this planet as themselves. This is possibly the most *profoundly* accurate statement I have ever made on usenet. Yeah but I've seen you Google video's they're a clear indication that you are certifiably insane, so what ever you say what ever your opinions are and they're usually totally bizarre, your insanity makes them utterly worthless. Now and again someone tells me that the bitches are still snapping at my heels, but unless someone like yourself nudges it all past filters that is all I hear of it, I guess they must truly love and miss me to keep the flame alive this long. Hope all's well for you and yours in canuckia, Gordy has pretty much screwed the pooch here so the only way for pubs with accomodation to turn a profit is to convert to bail hostels. cheers On 26 Jan, 03:55, "Andrew Taylor" Hope all's well for you and yours in canuckia, Gordy has pretty much screwed the pooch here so the only way for pubs with accomodation to turn a profit is to convert to bail hostels. Yes Canada is a better place to live. I just wish the pound had a better exchange rate against the Canadian dollar! I still have some money in the UK. On 27 Jan, 07:03, "Andrew Taylor" <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: >I still have some money in the > UK. so YOU'RE the one...... mandy and gordy would like to borrow it. > On 27 Jan, 07:03, "Andrew Taylor" > <andrewcrumpleh...@spamcopSUBVERSIVE.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > mandy and gordy would like to borrow it. Just make sure that bunt doesn't get his hands on it. You'll never see it again. >> Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal >> debts that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs > haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? Which precedent is that? >>> Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal >>> debts that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Which precedent is that? The precident where ISPs get hold of someone without a f.cking clue and use them to prove that silly little greasy pricks can't have them over in a fraud. >> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? > > Which precedent is that? That an ISP can not be held responsible as a 'publisher' for its paying members who print libellous remarks even if false. >>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? >> Which precedent is that? > That an ISP can not be held responsible as a 'publisher' for its paying > members who print libellous remarks even if false. Or in bunts case even if true. He IS a fraud and a con man but is very poor at both which is why his shitty battery scam collapsed. He's also a pervert >>>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > He's also a pervert http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=john+bunt&hl=en&emb=0&aq=f# http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=john+bunt&hl=en&emb=0&aq=f# >>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? >> Which precedent is that? > That an ISP can not be held responsible as a 'publisher' for its paying > members who print libellous remarks even if false. I'm sorry but john bunt can't answer the telephone right now. He's far too busy spanking little girls bums and going 'Phwooooar!' depending on how fast 12 year olds mature. >>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > That an ISP can not be held responsible as a 'publisher' for its > paying members who print libellous remarks even if false. A libellous remark is always false, it cannot be libel if it is true. As far as ISP's being held responsible for publishing material, anybody with good knowledge of the law knows that they still can be held liable. "I am also prepared to hold as a matter of law that an ISP which performs no more than a passive role in facilitating postings on the internet cannot be deemed to be a publisher at common law." [Most people with some knowledgeof law already knew this] "In determining responsibility for publication in the context of the law of defamation, it seems to me to be important to focus on what the person did, or failed to do, in the chain of communication. It is clear that the state of a defendant's knowledge can be an important factor. If a person knowingly permits another to communicate information which is defamatory, when there would be an opportunity to prevent the publication, there would seem to be no reason in principle why liability should not accrue." http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2006/407.html Note the sentence, "If a person knowingly permits another to communicate information which is defamatory, when there would be an opportunity to prevent the publication, there would seem to be no reason in principle why liability should not accrue." >>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? >> >> Which precedent is that? > That an ISP can not be held responsible as a 'publisher' for its > paying members who print libellous remarks even if false. A I stated at the time; http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.local.southwest/msg/54f3fe8a50822bce?hl=en If Bunt had put the ISP's 'on notice', he probably would have won his case, the fact is he failed to follow official procedure. It seems the PPA agree with me; "However, if the ISP is put on notice, then they will have the requisite actual knowledge and thus be liable. In the words of the court: "if a person knowingly permits another to communicate information which is defamatory, when there would be an opportunity to prevent the publication, there would seem to be no reason in principle why liability should not accrue." http://www.ppa.co.uk/cgi-bin/go.pl/legal/article.html?uid=10678&topic_uid=43 >>>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > If Bunt had put the ISP's 'on notice', he probably would have won his case, > the fact is he failed to follow official procedure. lol - The obnoxious little prick couldn't even get his name right. He issued the paperwork in one name and complained in another. It was nothing but (very poor) fraud from one end to the other. He COULDN'T have won. He should stick to goggling 12 years old tits and smacking their bums. >>>> How do you know John Bunt hasn't paid his bills, or that the ISPs >>>> haven't paid him for establishing a precedent in their favour? [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > http://www.ppa.co.uk/cgi-bin/go.pl/legal/article.html?uid=10678&topic_uid=43 £45.00. It seems to be paying slightly better than bunts attempts to defraud people. Just another £36955.00 to go now and he can pay his legal debts off. Don't bank on it though. Bunt has a history of welching and knocking people just like his thieving father. spamming git, sod off.  SignatureAustin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms... ------------------------------------------------\ >> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them. a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too! > Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal debts > that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=230321097415&ssPageNam e=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=013 Wow....selling for £2.20 now....he's gonna make a killing :-) Jon~ >> Just £36999.999 to go and John Bunt can pay off his £37,000 legal debts >> that he ran up trying to defraud ISPs. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Jon~ It's probably the pickup only bit that's putting punters off. The stench coming off the unwashed bald headed prick must be horrendous. SignatureDodgy chinese batteries, broken drills, kiddy porn and fraud our speciality www.surfbald.co.uk |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.