Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / February 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bevel + Mitre Gears

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve - 29 Jan 2009 22:17 GMT
Whats the difference between the two?

I'm considering using bevel gears (mitre?) to drive the governor on a small
stationary steam engine.  The drive would be 2:1 from the crankshaft then
1:1 to drive the governor.  The crankshaft is 7/16inch and the flywheel is
7-1/2 inch diameter.  The governor driveshaft can be chosen to suit,
probably 3/16.

Two challenges are to get the large gear on the crankshaft in proportion to
the flywheel and to find a supplier who want less than £20 a piece + VAT
+P&P  which makes the thing not doable.  RS don't have what I'm looking for
and HPC looks like well into £100 for the four.  EN8 or equivalent would be
fine.   Bronze gears would be great but I dread to think what the cost
wouldbe.

Any suggestions?

Steve
jasonballamy - 30 Jan 2009 07:48 GMT
If you could change the ratios around and have 2:1 at the governor then
th egears that I bought for my traction engine governor will do, brass
with 1/4" bor to the large wheel, 3/16" in the small but you could
solder in a bush. All for about £20 the pair. If they suit I will post
details.

Jason

Signature

jasonballamy

petercolman45@hotmail.com - 30 Jan 2009 08:22 GMT
> Whats the difference between the two?
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Steve

Why not make your own?
Peter
Steve - 30 Jan 2009 21:46 GMT
On Jan 29, 10:17 pm, "Steve" <steve.withn...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Whats the difference between the two?
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Steve

Why not make your own?
Peter

Looks too dificult - I have a mill and decent rotary table,  so plain spur
gears I can do,  but bevel gears look beyond beyond me.
Erik Olsen - 30 Jan 2009 21:56 GMT
> Looks too dificult - I have a mill and decent rotary table,  so plain
> spur gears I can do,  but bevel gears look beyond beyond me.

Wise decision. Proper bevel gears cannot be milled as the tooth pitch is
not constant.

Signature

Venlig hilsen/Best regards
Erik Olsen
http://www.modelbaneteknik.dk/

John S - 30 Jan 2009 23:18 GMT
> > Looks too dificult - I have a mill and decent rotary table,  so plain
> > spur gears I can do,  but bevel gears look beyond beyond me.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Venlig hilsen/Best regards
> Erik Olsenhttp://www.modelbaneteknik.dk/

So machine them as parallel depth bevels, it was a dodge brought out
in WWI so engineering shops could do bevels along a simpler line.
It save the hand fitting needed to part of the addendum.

John S.
Mark Rand - 31 Jan 2009 02:12 GMT
>So machine them as parallel depth bevels, it was a dodge brought out
>in WWI so engineering shops could do bevels along a simpler line.
>It save the hand fitting needed to part of the addendum.
>
>John S.

Doesn't that involve a second cut with the gear advanced a bit to thin the
teeth?

I'm sure Ivan Law had something to say on the subject.

regards
Mark Rand
RTFM
jasonballamy - 31 Jan 2009 07:44 GMT
There are errors in Law's methods. Been a recent post about cuttin
bevels on this forum.

http://modeleng.proboards20.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=3282

Another thought to keep the costs down as the gears don't need t
transmit much load is to use an off the shelf gear with a smaller O/
dia and bore, then bore it out to suit the 7/16 shaft.

Jaso

--
jasonballam
Steve - 01 Feb 2009 14:25 GMT
On 30 Jan, 21:56, "Erik Olsen" <erik.ol...@ishoejby.dk> wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > Looks too dificult - I have a mill and decent rotary table, so plain
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Venlig hilsen/Best regards
> Erik Olsenhttp://www.modelbaneteknik.dk/

So machine them as parallel depth bevels, it was a dodge brought out
in WWI so engineering shops could do bevels along a simpler line.
It save the hand fitting needed to part of the addendum.

John S.

Is this the thing -

ME Vol 130, No.3261 p814 "Cutting bevel gears by the parallel depth method"
by R.S.Minchin might offer some sensible advice.
Steve - 01 Feb 2009 16:26 GMT
On 30 Jan, 21:56, "Erik Olsen" <erik.ol...@ishoejby.dk> wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > Looks too dificult - I have a mill and decent rotary table, so plain
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Venlig hilsen/Best regards
> Erik Olsenhttp://www.modelbaneteknik.dk/

So machine them as parallel depth bevels, it was a dodge brought out
in WWI so engineering shops could do bevels along a simpler line.
It save the hand fitting needed to part of the addendum.

John S.

Just found this as a legitimate PDF download -  Handbook for machine
designers, shop men and draftsmen (1916) which has trhe design data and
method on p113 - 116
petercolman45@hotmail.com - 01 Feb 2009 11:50 GMT
> <petercolma...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

You need a dividing head which can be tilted, you will find the
calculations in Machinerys handbook. I have done several but it does
take time and concentration, If you need help contact me.
Peter
Richard Shute - 30 Jan 2009 09:43 GMT
>Whats the difference between the two?
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Steve

Don't know about prices, I've not used them for a while, but SH
Muffett were helpful a few years ago.
www.muffettgears.co.uk/

Richard
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.