Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / March 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bunt now owes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Harry - 16 Mar 2009 12:50 GMT
His legal fees of £37,000 minus ebays listing fees on his old sh.t that
no one wants. Oh dear he isn't doing very well is he?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=23
0330150140

Harry brother - 16 Mar 2009 12:53 GMT
> His legal fees of £37,000 minus ebays listing fees on his old sh.t that
> no one wants. Oh dear he isn't doing very well is he?
>
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=23
0330150140
 

'The seller ended this listing early because the item was lost or broken.'

Yep like all his old shite very broken.
Rob Wilson - 16 Mar 2009 16:54 GMT
>> His legal fees of £37,000 minus ebays listing fees on his old sh.t 
>> that no one wants. Oh dear he isn't doing very well is he?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Yep like all his old shite very broken.

Who are you on about?

Rob.
The Real Doctor - 16 Mar 2009 23:00 GMT
> Who are you on about?

John Bunt, who used to post as "Guy Fawkes" here. He started a libel
case against three posters to uk.local.south-west and tried to get
their ISPs included. That failed and he was landed with, potentially,
some rather large bills from the ISPs' lawyers.

A few rather childish uk.l.s-w posters occasionally try to stir up
trouble in laces where he used to post. They may safely be ignored.

Ian
Gregory Hall - 16 Mar 2009 23:35 GMT
>> Who are you on about?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Ian

I'm not sure anybody else has noticed what I view as an alarming trend. As
many of the creative and controversial folks such as Gay Fawkes are hounded
off Usenet for various and sundry reasons the newsgroups become more and
more boring due to the fact that only anal-retentive, uncreative, boring,
hidebound folks remain as they are the only ones dull enough to abide it.

Signature

Gregory Hall

Alastair - 17 Mar 2009 10:55 GMT
>I'm not sure anybody else has noticed what I view as an alarming trend. As
>many of the creative and controversial folks such as Gay Fawkes are hounded
>off Usenet for various and sundry reasons the newsgroups become more and
>more boring due to the fact that only anal-retentive, uncreative, boring,
>hidebound folks remain as they are the only ones dull enough to abide it.

That would be you and me, would it?

--
Alastair
3.5 - 17 Mar 2009 11:14 GMT
>>> Who are you on about?
>> John Bunt, who used to post as "Guy Fawkes" here. He started a libel
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> more boring due to the fact that only anal-retentive, uncreative, boring,
> hidebound folks remain as they are the only ones dull enough to abide it.

'Creative and controversial'? John Bunt/Guy Fawkes? He is an outright
crook with an unhealthy interest in children.
The Real Doctor - 17 Mar 2009 13:29 GMT
> 'Creative and controversial'? John Bunt/Guy Fawkes? He is <defamatory abuse snipped>.

He was loud mouthed, aggressive, rude and antagonistic here. Some of
his posts could have given him a nasty visit to the courts if Pete
Goss had known about them and been bothered.

But I do not believe there is a shred of evidence to support the
accusations you and others make.

Ian
Steve Firth - 17 Mar 2009 14:54 GMT
> But I do not believe there is a shred of evidence to support the
> accusations you and others make.

Nor do I, but his fan club seem to believe that a judge has given them
carte blanche to libel and abuse Bunt. It's a case of a bunch of sad
little bullies getting their kicks from kicking someone when he's down.
Poacher Pete - 17 Mar 2009 14:57 GMT
>A few rather childish uk.l.s-w posters occasionally try to stir up
>trouble in laces where he used to post. They may safely be ignored.

I found it highly entertaining whilst it lasted. They and their supporters and
of course their socks spent hours flamming each other like nobodys
business. We got a running commentary on each court appearance from
posters purporting to be from one side or the other. Advisors appeared and at
one stage were ten a penny and true to the nature of usenet disappeared as
soon as he lost his action against the ISPs. However, he had the satisfaction
of getting the extent of ISP liability clarified.

There is a down side to it. Since the outcome of the court case the ng in
question has become moribund. Posts are few and far between. Nearly
all of the regulars have disappeared, not a great loss in at least 6 of them,
gone to other ngs I suspect.

Well it was hilarious whilst it lasted. I thought that little good would come of
it. But it was first class entertainment! The old story of cliques when they
fall out and they always do the sh.t really hits the fan at a great rate of
knots......those were the days!! I miss them.

Live in peace fellow humans. It's cheaper.

Pete
Cliff Coggin - 17 Mar 2009 18:38 GMT
>>> His legal fees of £37,000 minus ebays listing fees on his old sh.t that
>>> no one wants. Oh dear he isn't doing very well is he?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
> Who are you on about?

I have no idea and I care even less, but I wish the pillock would stop
inflicting his manic delusions on the rest of us.

Cliff Coggin.
Kevin MacDoughnut - 18 Mar 2009 11:35 GMT
> I have no idea and I care even less, but I wish the pillock would stop
> inflicting his manic delusions on the rest of us.
>
> Cliff Coggin.

This might help you put posts like this into some sort of perspective:

It is now general knowledge that  the uk. hierarchy  was set up
by the government to plug the gaps created by the abysmal
failure of their Psychiatric Care in the Community Policy.
The uk. hierarchy was devised to provide an outlet for
individuals who would otherwise spending their days sitting
at home wearing an aluminium foil hat waiting for a full moon
to rise. It was hoped that this would reduce the incidence
of nutters out there howling at the moon and frightening the
sh.t out of their neighbours. Another of HMGs aims and
objectives was to provide a distraction to take their minds
of the problem of who they were going to knife to death next.
Unfortunately this group, like others, has been taken over by the
articulate lower middle classes who have succeeding in
driving HMGs target audience away.Independant research has
shown that it was the amount and quality of the inane drivel,
called small talk which the middle classes are adept at, which
had the effect of doing those poor souls heads in. They left to
protect what was left of their sanity. Saddly this has happened
to the whole of uk.local. hierarchy.  

This newsgroup is a very good example of another HMG failure.
Quilljar - 18 Mar 2009 11:43 GMT
hmmmm... MacDoughnut eh?  Very appropriate!

Signature

Yours Quilly,

ken - 27 Mar 2009 19:57 GMT
Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
small dose of the same medicine he had been forcing on others for many
years?

k
Steve Firth - 27 Mar 2009 20:50 GMT
> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
> small dose of the same medicine he had been forcing on others for many
> years?
>
> k

It looks more like the same Chris Stevens owner of multiple aliases.

How's the business going Chris?

(snigger).
George - 28 Mar 2009 11:12 GMT
>> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
>> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> (snigger).

Probably a bit better than Bunts cheap Chinese Batteries (UK) Ltd
or Bunts legal advice services <snigger>
Steve Firth - 31 Mar 2009 00:04 GMT
> >> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
> >> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Probably a bit better than Bunts cheap Chinese Batteries (UK) Ltd
> or Bunts legal advice services <snigger>

It seems to be level-pegging (guffaw), just a smoking hole in the
ground.
Joe - 31 Mar 2009 10:11 GMT
>>>> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
>>>> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> It seems to be level-pegging (guffaw), just a smoking hole in the
> ground.

Correct me if I'm wrong but it's not Chris who has been reduced to
flogging old sh.t on ebay because he's so skint is it?

It's not Chris who has done a moonlight flit rather than pay his bills
is it?
ken - 31 Mar 2009 21:22 GMT
> >>>> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
> >>>> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> It's not Chris who has done a moonlight flit rather than pay his bills
> is it?

Steve Firth is someone whose opinions count for very little, and like
John Bunt has a very inflated view of his own worth.
Cliff Ray - 31 Mar 2009 21:25 GMT
>  has a very inflated view of his own worth.

I also have an inflated view of my own worth and it still only comes to 73p.
Austin Shackles - 28 Mar 2009 10:32 GMT
>Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
>apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
>small dose of the same medicine he had been forcing on others for many
>years?

fer feck's sake can everyone shut up about bloody John Bunt?  I'm sick of
hearing about it.

feckin' trolls.

harumph.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy!  Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\  
  >>  http://www.schlockmercenary.com/  <<      \  ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!

Michael - 28 Mar 2009 12:52 GMT
> feckin' trolls.

It is now general knowledge that  this newsgroup was set up
by the government to plug the gaps created by the abysmal
failure of their Psychiatric Care in the Community Policy.
The uk.local hierarchy was devised to provide an outlet for
individuals who would otherwise spending their days sitting
at home wearing an aluminium foil hat waiting for a full moon
to rise. It was hoped that this would reduce the incidence
of nutters out there howling at the moon and frightening the
sh.t out of their neighbours. Another of HMGs aims and
objectives was to provide a distraction to take their minds
of the problem of who they were going to knife to death next.
Unfortunately, this group has been taken over by the
articulate lower middle classes who have succeeding in
driving HMGs target audience away.Independant research has
shown that it was the amount and quality of the inane drivel,
called small talk which the middle classes are adept at, which
had the effect of doing their heads in. They left to
protect what was left of their sanity. Saddly this has happened
to the whole of uk.local. hierarchy.  

This newsgroup is a very good example of another HMG failure.
Four by two - 29 Mar 2009 15:39 GMT
>> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
>> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> harumph.

£36,997 to go then he's paid it off
ken - 29 Mar 2009 18:40 GMT
> >> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
> >> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> £36,997 to go then he's paid it off

I am not sure exactly how much state benefit Mr Bunt is getting at the
moment, but even if he is being paid toward the higher end of the
scale, paying back a 5 figure sum is likely to take some while!
A 12 year old with well developed tits for her age - 29 Mar 2009 18:47 GMT
>>>> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
>>>> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> moment, but even if he is being paid toward the higher end of the
> scale, paying back a 5 figure sum is likely to take some while!

So long as he keeps enough back to buy me sweeties.
ken - 30 Mar 2009 08:12 GMT
On Mar 29, 6:47 pm, A 12 year old with well developed tits for her age
<hugeknock...@tiscali.net> wrote:
> >>>> Is this the same John Bunt who suggested he had become impotent,
> >>>> apparently as a direct result of his inability to stomach even a very
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> So long as he keeps enough back to buy me sweeties.

Tut tut............thats surely the sort of comment that resulted in
Mr Bunt suffering from a limp dick, and feeling that the ISPs should
pay dearly for his difficulties in that area?

k
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.