> > Fancy making some waterproof connectors (similar tohttp://www.qvsdirect.com/fiximages/files/weatherproof_accessories/aqu...)
> > so wondering what plastic to use.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Regards
> Kevin
As far as I know, Delrin and acetal are different, Delrin is stronger
but acetal is less hygroscopic. There's a place near me that sells
PVC rod too - is that easy to work with? I've got a Myford Super 7 and
use indexable tools. Worth getting some bits of each in anyway, plenty
of other projects to start (need to make a threaded adaptor for an
American pump - need to cut 11.5tpi internal thread)
Peter Neill - 14 Apr 2009 19:18 GMT
>> > Fancy making some waterproof connectors (similar tohttp://www.qvsdirect.com/fiximages/files/weatherproof_accessories/aqu...)
>> > so wondering what plastic to use.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>of other projects to start (need to make a threaded adaptor for an
>American pump - need to cut 11.5tpi internal thread)
Delrin is Acetal.
DuPont invented Acetal Homopoylmer, and the other manufactureres
developed Acetal Copolymer (which has randon ethylene oxide molecules
dotted around the chains) to get around the patent, but both are
PolyOxyMethylene (POM) or Acetal in laymans parlance.
The homopolymer (Delrin) is marginally stiffer, but is less suitable
for applications where it will come into prolonged contact with HOT
water, where thermal oxidation can rapidly cause failure.
Both are hygroscopic to the extent they must be dried thoroughly
before moulding, but compared to Nylons their absorbtion is
insignificant in terms of application and use.
Anyway, Nylon/Acetal/PVC/ABS are all suitable as long as you use an
elastomer seal to prevent ingress.
Peter
If buying it for the job then I'd prefer to
> machine acetal, but if you've got some nylon lying around use that.
> There used to be someone on ebay who sold cheap offcuts of plastic
> bar, don't know if they are still there -worth a look.
>
> Regards
> Kevin
I'm still there, just moved the store to .com is all;
http://stores.shop.ebay.com/The-Great-Industrial-Garage-Sale__W0QQ_armrsZ1
Nylon can absorb up to 25% of its weight in water - UHMW absorbs
virtually zero and delrin only a few percent.
If that connector is going to see any rough use, I'd suggest UHMW
because it's virtually unbreakable.
Peter Neill - 15 Apr 2009 11:24 GMT
>I'm still there, just moved the store to .com is all;
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>If that connector is going to see any rough use, I'd suggest UHMW
>because it's virtually unbreakable.
Absolute bollocks.
Nylon will absorb around 2.5% of its weight in water at equilibrium
conditions, and a maximum of around 8%, but only in super-saturated
immersion conditions.
It will then release the absorbed water and give up its weight and
reverse the size change as the conditions ger drier.
If you get a hydrolysis stable grade (developed for automotive use) it
will still absorb some water, but without the molecular
dis-association that leads to size changes.
Acetal will absorb around 0.25% at equilibrium and a maximum of around
0.85% in saturation, but the size change in Acetal is neglible.
UHMW-PE, to give it it's proper name (Ultra High Molecular Weight
POLYETHYLENE) ie extremely tough though, so correct on one account.
Peter
Cliff Coggin - 15 Apr 2009 13:54 GMT
> Absolute bollocks.
Now then Peter, no need to beat about the bush. Tell us what you really mean
:)
Cliff Coggin.
Mark Rand - 15 Apr 2009 12:30 GMT
> If buying it for the job then I'd prefer to
>> machine acetal, but if you've got some nylon lying around use that.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>I'm still there, just moved the store to .com is all;
No, the relevant seller us Ringwood Precision:-
http://stores.shop.ebay.co.uk/Ringwood-Precision-Engineering
Selling from New York isn't relevant to ukrme :-|
Mark Rand
RTFM
Kevin - 15 Apr 2009 23:01 GMT
> If buying it for the job then I'd prefer to
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> If that connector is going to see any rough use, I'd suggest UHMW
> because it's virtually unbreakable.
UHMWPE is a fantastic material for some uses, mainly involving wear
resistance. But it is an absolute pig to machine and requires razor
sharp tools. I wouldn't reccomend it for this application, massivly
over specced. Virtually any engineering plastic would do. Quite
agree with Peter regarding water.
Regards
Kevin
Robin - 19 Apr 2009 19:01 GMT
> > If buying it for the job then I'd prefer to
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Regards
> Kevin
Think I'll just get some Acetal - it's not too critical whether it
absorbs water or not - the threads it will screw onto aren't formed
very well anyway so I'll probably have to fudge it with PTFE tape
anyway