Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / April 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Couplings for CNC

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter Fairbrother - 26 Apr 2009 20:12 GMT
There seem to be two types of motor-screw couplings for CNC - Oldham
couplings where there is a sliding disk,and a type whose name I don't
know with spiral cuts in them.

Both seem to be very expensive for what you get!

Anyway, can anyone tell me what they actually do -the Olham couplings
seem to compensate for slight misalignment between the drive and driven
shafts, but do the other ones do the same? Which is better?

Thanks,

-- Peter Fairbrother
John S - 26 Apr 2009 21:05 GMT
> There seem to be two types of motor-screw couplings for CNC - Oldham
> couplings where there is a sliding disk,and a type whose name I don't
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> -- Peter Fairbrother

Oldham couplings are not expensive, look in Arc new catalogue and you
can get both halves and the torque disk for under a tenner.
I have to make certain specials and believe me if  could buy them for
the amount of work involved I would.

Oldham couplings do compensate for misalignment and because they are
separate it's not a continuous twisting action like the spiral cut
type.
If there is any large misalignment these will destroy themselves over
a period of time.

John S.
steamer - 26 Apr 2009 21:09 GMT
>There seem to be two types of motor-screw couplings for CNC - Oldham
>couplings where there is a sliding disk,and a type whose name I don't
>know with spiral cuts in them.
    --This latter type is called a helical coupling; invented in WWII
for use in bombsights, IIRC. The process for making them was kept a trade
secret for over 50 years. They're very neat couplings because they have
*zero* backlash, so they're very useful in things like cnc machines. The
biggest company making them is Helical Products. There's one other, newer
company as well but the name escapes me at the moment. If ya ever see 'em
surplus grab 'em; they last forever..

Signature

       "Steamboat Ed" Haas         :  Imagine what I could do if
       Hacking the Trailing Edge!  :  I knew what I was doing...
                         www.nmpproducts.com
                  ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words---

Tony Jeffree - 27 Apr 2009 07:25 GMT
>There seem to be two types of motor-screw couplings for CNC - Oldham
>couplings where there is a sliding disk,and a type whose name I don't
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>seem to compensate for slight misalignment between the drive and driven
>shafts, but do the other ones do the same? Which is better?

I have used Oldham couplings for my various projects and have found
them to work well and reliably. Both types are "zero" backlash -
although in reality, there is no such thing - the sliding plate in the
Oldham couplings will have some degree of give in it, and the spiral
type couplings are effectively coupling the two shafts together with a
spring that can wind up/unwind to some extent. So both types will
exhibit some backlash, depending on the load and the size of the
coupling.

Regards,
Tony
Alun - 27 Apr 2009 09:02 GMT
>>There seem to be two types of motor-screw couplings for CNC - Oldham
>>couplings where there is a sliding disk,and a type whose name I don't
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> exhibit some backlash, depending on the load and the size of the
> coupling.

ISTR reading somewhere that the Oldham coupling is used where there
is a chance of only a lateral mis-alignment whereas the spiral (helical,
surely?)
coupling is used for angular mis-alignment and that neither coupling is
suited
to the domain of the other.

References? Where did I read this? Sorry, no idea!
Tony Jeffree - 27 Apr 2009 12:24 GMT
>ISTR reading somewhere that the Oldham coupling is used where there
>is a chance of only a lateral mis-alignment whereas the spiral (helical,
>surely?)
>coupling is used for angular mis-alignment and that neither coupling is
>suited
>to the domain of the other.

True - the Oldham coupling isn't good for significant angular
misaligment, and the helical ones are no good for significant lateral
misalignment. Both will tolerate a small amount of the "wrong" kind of
misalignment though.

There are some couplings that are designed to take both types of
misalignment - for example, the "Uni-Lat" coupling (e.g., RS part
number 748-421) - but these are somewhat more expensive.

Regards,
Tony
Alun - 27 Apr 2009 12:43 GMT
>>ISTR reading somewhere that the Oldham coupling is used where there
>>is a chance of only a lateral mis-alignment whereas the spiral (helical,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> misalignment - for example, the "Uni-Lat" coupling (e.g., RS part
> number 748-421) - but these are somewhat more expensive.

Googled for Unilat and found this which seems to be a good summary ...

http://www.engineerlive.com/Design-Engineer/Power_Transmission/How_to_choose_the
_right_shaft_coupling_for_the_correct_application/18937/


But, but, but ... we're engineers, ain't we?

The manufacturing of our own Oldham style couplings must
be a distinct possibility.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.