> Perhaps those that are fitted to wind-up torches. They are
> cheap enough these days to buy and dismantle. Then you've
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> specified as motors and not generators, how I could find the right one
>> for this application or i anyone had a suggestion for what to use.
I will try and get my hands on a wind-up torch, but I do fear I will
not have enough torque to turn it..
For diameter of turbine, well, it will have to fit the motor I get. I
am currently looking at 2 models, one of which is already made but
missing. Heres some pictures: http://tidalenergycanada.blogspot.com/
The larger black turbine, modeled after OpenHydro's turbine , is the
one I might be able to use if I can find it. It has higher rpms, and
has a stable base. The model I am currently working on, the Sketchup
model picture, is SMD Hydrovision's TidEL turbine, and is more complex
as it "floats" in the current. It will also be quite small, about
1:120 scale (which means the diameter of the pods' will approx. be
2.08cm)
Thanks!!!
Richard Shute - 24 Jul 2009 16:48 GMT
Hello Jonah,
Do you really mean 2.08cm?? 20mm? If you do and you are expecting it
to turn at just 10PRM then you are in fantasy land if you hope it will
drive a generator of the sort you are discussing.
As a starting point, just do a quick calculation of the energy in the
water that will flow through the turbine. ie 1/2mv^2. That's way more
than you will get out for heaps of reasons and I doubt that even if
you got it all, you'd be able to light an LED. At 1ms-1 a 1mx20mm
column of water contains about 157mJ which is 157mW passing the
turbine, if you brought the water to a standstill and converted all
the kinetic energy to electrical.
Why do you need to 'generate' current for the
experiment/demonstration. An external power source and any of a wide
variety of sensors to drive/control LED's would indicate the speed or
any other parameter you might want to measure.
Rdgs Richard
>I will try and get my hands on a wind-up torch, but I do fear I will
>not have enough torque to turn it..
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Thanks!!!
Jonah Tremblay - 24 Jul 2009 18:49 GMT
On Jul 24, 12:48 pm, Richard Shute <sharkface.pi...@toucansurf.com>
wrote:
> Hello Jonah,
> Do you really mean 2.08cm?? 20mm? If you do and you are expecting it
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> >Thanks!!!
Thank you for the info/ reality check- and yes I mean 20mm for the
model to fit in our flume.. but 20mm is the diameter of the pod - the
diameter of the blades (2) will be 15cm.. this would give me
The project is mainly to observe the environmental effects on the
seabed, but one small aspect is to have it power something visual for
the high school/investment tours that come around every once in a
while. Having the model actually light up an LED would have a greater
impact than a spinning piece of metal -
Thanks again!
Jonah Tremblay - 24 Jul 2009 19:56 GMT
> On Jul 24, 12:48 pm, Richard Shute <sharkface.pi...@toucansurf.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> Thanks again!
Sorry posted without finishing.. the 15cm diameter blades would give
me 487mW, so 974 mW total.
Bob Minchin - 24 Jul 2009 18:17 GMT
> I will try and get my hands on a wind-up torch, but I do fear I will
> not have enough torque to turn it..
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks!!!
I suggest you hold fire on the pictures and put some work into some
basic physics. I can't see that working at the proposed scale will yeild
the result you are hoping for.
Bob