
Signature
James Hancock
Remove nospamthanks to reply
I've found that straight track presents no problems.
I'll have a look at the wheels because I feel they are closer together (not
close enough to the rails) compared to other stock.
I also think the tilting mechanism makes cornering worse!
> > Cheers Jim - I'll look for a better surface!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > only been run a couple of times from new! (It's the Bachmann Super
> Voyager)
> Ah, right! I've found that the Super Voyager is a right pain to get
> working - it doesn't seem to run well on anything :( If you could post
> back here if you discover what must be done to the track to get it to
> run, I'd be grateful!
> Cheers
Phil: To improve mine, I've added lead to each bogie (with an insulating
layer to the axles), but still get problems with the bogie behind the
power car ( the trailing coach/bogie, whichever disrection the unit is
running, or however many coaches conected) when it comes out of a bend,
and 'should' straighten up - it appears as if the spring is too strong and
lifts the bogie to keep it close to the body!
Whereas my non-super voyager, pendolino, and old APT run without problems.

Signature
Phil Spiegelhalter: Phil@fillin.co.uk
==== Technical Training for Broadcasters =====
*RE CUE Mobile DV Multi-Camera Production and Non-Linear Editing*
EverettPet - 21 Jun 2004 16:37 GMT
As there was a bit of sunshine this afternoon I did a bit of experimenting with
the Voyager.
I think the coupling mechanism and the length of the body is to blame for most
of the drailments. The wheel spacing is the same as other trains and the wheel
base (on single bogie) and distance from the bogie centre to centre of coupling
is only 2mm more than my good running Bachmann 158.
http://members.aol.com/EverettPet/voyager/ for ramblings on and photos
MartinS - 21 Jun 2004 18:29 GMT
> As there was a bit of sunshine this afternoon I did a bit of
> experimenting with the Voyager.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://members.aol.com/EverettPet/voyager/ for ramblings on and
> photos
Definitely. The reverse curves with no transition are pretty severe for
coaches of this length with body-mounted couplings.
Would this be a typical situation on a permanent layout?

Signature
Martin S.
Erik Olsen - 21 Jun 2004 19:52 GMT
> Definitely. The reverse curves with no transition are pretty severe
> for coaches of this length with body-mounted couplings.
> Would this be a typical situation on a permanent layout?
I hope not. In my opinion it's a definite no-no.

Signature
Venlig hilsen
Erik Olsen
http://www.modelbaneteknik.dk/