Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Derailments

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
EverettPet - 20 Jun 2004 19:48 GMT
What usually causes derailments on older track?

I've been cleaning some and the test train kept derailing at curves.  The only
obvoius thing was the uneven surface the track was on.
Jim Guthrie - 20 Jun 2004 21:39 GMT
>What usually causes derailments on older track?
>
>I've been cleaning some and the test train kept derailing at curves.  The only
>obvoius thing was the uneven surface the track was on.

The uneven surface the track is on :-)

Seriously, though,  I would lay odds on that that is the root cause of
your problem.  Track does need to have a good, flat base if things are
to run well on it..

Jim.
EverettPet - 20 Jun 2004 21:59 GMT
Cheers Jim - I'll look for a better surface!

Ken, the wheels are definately clean and I assume they're pretty true as it's
only been run a couple of times from new! (It's the Bachmann Super Voyager)
MartinS - 20 Jun 2004 23:05 GMT
> Cheers Jim - I'll look for a better surface!
>
> Ken, the wheels are definately clean and I assume they're pretty
> true as it's only been run a couple of times from new! (It's the
> Bachmann Super Voyager)

Newer models have finer-scale wheels and are more likely to be affected
by minor track misalignment. Get a better surface and/or newer track.

Signature

Martin S.

James Hancock - 21 Jun 2004 12:13 GMT
> Cheers Jim - I'll look for a better surface!
>
> Ken, the wheels are definately clean and I assume they're pretty true as it's
> only been run a couple of times from new! (It's the Bachmann Super Voyager)

Ah, right! I've found that the Super Voyager is a right pain to get
working - it doesn't seem to run well on anything :( If you could post back
here if you discover what must be done to the track to get it to run, I'd be
grateful!

Cheers

Signature

James Hancock
Remove nospamthanks to reply

EverettPet - 21 Jun 2004 12:54 GMT
I've found that straight track presents no problems.

I'll have a look at the wheels because I feel they are closer together (not
close enough to the rails) compared to other stock.

I also think the tilting mechanism makes cornering worse!
Phil - 21 Jun 2004 13:39 GMT
> > Cheers Jim - I'll look for a better surface!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > only been run a couple of times from new! (It's the Bachmann Super
> Voyager)

> Ah, right! I've found that the Super Voyager is a right pain to get
> working - it doesn't seem to run well on anything :( If you could post
> back here if you discover what must be done to the track to get it to
> run, I'd be grateful!
> Cheers

Phil: To improve mine, I've added lead to each bogie (with an insulating
layer to the axles), but still get problems with the bogie behind the
power car ( the trailing coach/bogie, whichever disrection the unit is
running, or however many coaches conected) when it  comes out of a bend,
and 'should' straighten up - it appears as if the spring is too strong and
lifts the bogie to keep it close to the body!
Whereas my non-super voyager, pendolino, and old APT run without problems.

Signature

           Phil Spiegelhalter: Phil@fillin.co.uk
       ==== Technical Training for Broadcasters =====
*RE CUE Mobile DV Multi-Camera Production and Non-Linear Editing*

EverettPet - 21 Jun 2004 16:37 GMT
As there was a bit of sunshine this afternoon I did a bit of experimenting with
the Voyager.

I think the coupling mechanism  and the length of the body is to blame for most
of the drailments.  The wheel spacing is the same as other trains and the wheel
base (on single bogie) and distance from the bogie centre to centre of coupling
is only 2mm more than my good running Bachmann 158.

http://members.aol.com/EverettPet/voyager/  for ramblings on and photos
MartinS - 21 Jun 2004 18:29 GMT
> As there was a bit of sunshine this afternoon I did a bit of
> experimenting with the Voyager.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://members.aol.com/EverettPet/voyager/  for ramblings on and
> photos

Definitely. The reverse curves with no transition are pretty severe for
coaches of this length with body-mounted couplings.
Would this be a typical situation on a permanent layout?

Signature

Martin S.

Erik Olsen - 21 Jun 2004 19:52 GMT
> Definitely. The reverse curves with no transition are pretty severe
> for coaches of this length with body-mounted couplings.
> Would this be a typical situation on a permanent layout?

I hope not. In my opinion it's a definite no-no.

Signature

Venlig hilsen
Erik Olsen
http://www.modelbaneteknik.dk/

Ken Parkes - 20 Jun 2004 21:40 GMT
> What usually causes derailments on older track?
>
> I've been cleaning some and the test train kept derailing at curves.  The only
> obvoius thing was the uneven surface the track was on.

Are the wheels clean and true?

Ken.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.