Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bachmann Branch line loco's

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ian Cornish - 25 Feb 2005 16:08 GMT
Hi,

I'm looking at buying a new loco (steam) for my (small) layout. Looking
through the Bachmann Branch Line catalog, I quite like the LMS Crab's,
the Collett Goods, and the Ivatt Class 4's.
But, the catalogue, unlike the Hornby one, does not state if the loco's
are suited to 1st radius curves. Can anyone shed any light on whether
any of the above can run on 1st radius curves ?

(Before some of the purist's go off about 1st radius not being scale, I
do this for my personal enjoyment, not to do it to scale/historical
accuracy - and I don't have much space available)

Thanks in advance,

Ian
Wolf Kirchmeir - 25 Feb 2005 17:03 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Ian

Just what is a "1st radius" curve? Can't you just specify in inches (or
cm)? Besides, different "systems" have different specs for "1st
radius/small radius", etc.
kim - 25 Feb 2005 22:40 GMT
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> cm)? Besides, different "systems" have different specs for "1st
> radius/small radius", etc.

I don't mean to flame Wolf but IIRC in the UK 1st Radius = 18" for 00 and 9"
for N-gauge. This being "uk.rec.models.rail" the original poster's
terminology is perfectly valid.

(kim)
John Sullivan - 26 Feb 2005 08:54 GMT
>> Just what is a "1st radius" curve? Can't you just specify in inches (or
>> cm)? Besides, different "systems" have different specs for "1st
>> radius/small radius", etc.
>
>I don't mean to flame Wolf but IIRC in the UK 1st Radius = 18" for 00

No it isn't. First radius is 371 mm. according to the latest Hornby
catalogue, which when dividing by 25.4 gives 14.6 inches.

>and 9"
>for N-gauge. This being "uk.rec.models.rail" the original poster's
>terminology is perfectly valid.
>
>(kim)

Signature

John Sullivan
OO in the garden http://www.yddraiggoch.demon.co.uk/railway/railway.html

John Turner - 25 Feb 2005 17:20 GMT
> I'm looking at buying a new loco (steam) for my (small) layout. Looking
> through the Bachmann Branch Line catalog, I quite like the LMS Crab's,
> the Collett Goods, and the Ivatt Class 4's.
> But, the catalogue, unlike the Hornby one, does not state if the loco's
> are suited to 1st radius curves. Can anyone shed any light on whether
> any of the above can run on 1st radius curves ?

Most of the larger Bachmann and Hornby locos require *at least* 2nd radius
curves, and I'd certainly suggest that the Crab and the Ivatt 4MT (when it's
eventually released) will want the larger radius.  The Collett 0-6-0 should
be ok on first radius.

John.
John Sullivan - 25 Feb 2005 18:01 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>But, the catalogue, unlike the Hornby one, does not state if the loco's
>are suited to 1st radius curves.

Yes it does. Look at the Contents page (page 3). The first sentence
after the table of contents says
<quote>
Bachmann Products are not recommended for use on First Radius Curve
Track.
</quote>

> Can anyone shed any light on whether any of the above can run on 1st
>radius curves ?
>
>(Before some of the purist's go off about 1st radius not being scale, I
>do this for my personal enjoyment, not to do it to scale/historical
>accuracy - and I don't have much space available)

I don't think anybody has the right to complain about 1st radius not
being scale, because even in the most fine-scale of layouts there are
many things that are not to scale. Just make sure you enjoy yourself.

>Thanks in advance,
>
>Ian

Signature

John Sullivan
OO in the garden http://www.yddraiggoch.demon.co.uk/railway/railway.html

mindesign - 25 Feb 2005 20:39 GMT
hear hear

:)))))

Steve

>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>>Ian
William Pearce - 28 Feb 2005 09:21 GMT
   I doubt whether too many purists could have scale radii on their
layouts. 5 chain curves, mainly on sidings, traversed at 2 or 3  mph by
little shunting locos, have an OO equivalent of 4.34 feet, 10 chain curves,
most branch lines, OO equiv. 8.68 feet radius. 20 chains, probably minimum
on main lines, more than 17 feet radius. Who has sufficient undercover space
to use such scale curves? Most of us because of space limitations, are lucky
to be able to use 4 ft. radius curves, less than 5 chains in real life,
around which we run our expresses at speeds often well in excess of a scale
60 mph! But it's all compromise.
                               Regards,
                                                   Bill.

> >Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >
> >Ian
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.