Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / March 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New look GNER HST

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Adam - 28 Mar 2005 19:02 GMT
GNER's 43118 "City of Kingston Upon Hull" is now sporting rather fetching
new headlight clusters with Group Standard Headlights (with combined LED
tail/marker light).

The clusters and horn-grille are finished in silver (presumably to match the

91s) and look rather fetching, once the initial shock has passed! Photos

here:

http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p13169685.html

http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p13169686.html

Regards,

Adam Warr, Peterborough UK

Electra Railway Graphics

www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk

Fotopic Site:

http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
Ewan - 28 Mar 2005 19:12 GMT
> The clusters and horn-grille are finished in silver (presumably to match the
> 91s) and look rather fetching, once the initial shock has passed! Photos
>
> here:
> http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p13169685.html

Boy racer styling!

eat

Signature

<><|"It is easy to be wise after the event." - Proverb
ScR|http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scot-rail/
Pix|http://photos.eatnet.org.uk/87012 <- first visit to Scotland

Adam - 28 Mar 2005 19:45 GMT
Boy racer styling!

I wondered why the driver was sporting a Burberry baseball cap...

Adam
Simon Ough - 28 Mar 2005 20:17 GMT
> Boy racer styling!
>
> I wondered why the driver was sporting a Burberry baseball cap...

Looks bloody hideous to me!

Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernow Telecom - Cheap international calls
(India only 10p/min on 0871 570 8216), (USA, Europe
and Oz National rate on 0870 794 8303/0844 570 8303)
Email us for more rates and unlocking offers!
**Old website still going- http://kernow-telecom.co.uk**
------------------------------------------------------------------

Craig O'Brien - 28 Mar 2005 22:27 GMT
>> Boy racer styling!
>>
>> I wondered why the driver was sporting a Burberry baseball cap...
>
> Looks bloody hideous to me!

Have to agree here, it looks bloody awful!
Pyromancer - 29 Mar 2005 00:06 GMT
Upon the miasma of midnight, a darkling spirit identified as Craig
O'Brien <applepie@blueyonder.co.uk> gently breathed:

>>> Boy racer styling!
>>> I wondered why the driver was sporting a Burberry baseball cap...
>>
>> Looks bloody hideous to me!
>
>Have to agree here, it looks bloody awful!

I like it.

Signature

 - Pyromancer Stormshadow.
http://www.inkubus-sukkubus.co.uk   <-- Pagan Gothic Rock!
http://www.littlematchgirl.co.uk    <-- Electronic Metal!
http://www.revival.stormshadow.com  <-- The Gothic Revival.

Martin WY - 29 Mar 2005 07:42 GMT
>Upon the miasma of midnight, a darkling spirit identified as Craig
>O'Brien <applepie@blueyonder.co.uk> gently breathed:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>I like it.
I and two fellow colleagues of EWS like it too.
jon.porter1@lycosmax.co.uk - 29 Mar 2005 00:37 GMT
> >> Boy racer styling!
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Have to agree here, it looks bloody awful!

The FGW fleet have been undergoing this mod for some time now, yet the
only difference you'll see is when they are lit. Maybe this is a way
for GNER depot staff to readily ID the modified one's more easily?
dwb - 29 Mar 2005 11:31 GMT
> The FGW fleet have been undergoing this mod for some time now, yet the
> only difference you'll see is when they are lit. Maybe this is a way
> for GNER depot staff to readily ID the modified one's more easily?

Are the LEDS bright enough/able to be directed to act as the main driving
lights, or are they just there for visibility?
Daniel Bound - 29 Mar 2005 16:25 GMT
> > The FGW fleet have been undergoing this mod for some time now, yet the
> > only difference you'll see is when they are lit. Maybe this is a way
> > for GNER depot staff to readily ID the modified one's more easily?
>
> Are the LEDS bright enough/able to be directed to act as the main driving
> lights, or are they just there for visibility?

Headlights aren't for the drivers benefit, they are for trackside workers to
see a train coming at night and get out of the way before being squashed!
Ross - 29 Mar 2005 18:08 GMT
[...]
> Headlights aren't for the drivers benefit, they are for trackside workers to
> see a train coming at night and get out of the way before being squashed!

So they tell us. Which is why they now fit headlights which are so
bright that they reflect back into your eyes off lineside foliage
making it difficult to see, and which (at best) distract or (at worst)
effectively blind drivers of oncoming trains for minutes at a time,
meaning that those drivers can't actually see trackside workers who
haven't reacted to the oncoming train.

The headlights now being fitted are dippable in the rest of Europe, to
minimise the risk of distraction. In the UK, where we are supposedly
so much more concerned about safety, they ain't.

And in the UK drivers complaining about the intensity of the lights
are told they don't know what they're talking about. After all, what
would a train driver know about the effect of train headlights? They
only drive the damn trains, after all.

Am I bitter about this? Yes, I am. And so are a lot of other train
drivers.
Signature

Ross, a.k.a.
Prof. E. Scrooge, CT, 153 & bar, Doctor of Cynicism (U. Life)

John Turner - 29 Mar 2005 18:35 GMT
> So they tell us. Which is why they now fit headlights which are so
> bright that they reflect back into your eyes off lineside foliage
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Am I bitter about this? Yes, I am. And so are a lot of other train
> drivers.

Agreed absolutely I await the first instance of a major incident where a
train driver claims to have missed a signal because of the intensity of
these lights.  I wonder what the response would be?

John.
0.7ohm Drop Shunt - 29 Mar 2005 19:56 GMT
> [...]
> > Headlights aren't for the drivers benefit, they are for trackside workers to
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Ross, a.k.a.
> Prof. E. Scrooge, CT, 153 & bar, Doctor of Cynicism (U. Life)

Totally accept what your saying, but the lights were in drastic need of
improvement.

Older headlights in bright day light are virtually invisable, the (ever
decreasing sized) Yellow End is more noticable.

158's? Terrible! The grime on the front lens doesnt help.

The 3rd cyclops lamp is a waste of time on 170's. The glare from the
orange destination indicator is better.

Dipped headlights sounds like a great idea, so I guess that rules them
out then.
Ross - 29 Mar 2005 23:47 GMT
On 29 Mar 2005 10:56:30 -0800, 0.7ohm Drop Shunt wrote in
<1112122590.700164.201850@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, seen in
uk.railway:

> > [...]
> > > Headlights aren't for the drivers benefit, they are for trackside
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > at a time, meaning that those drivers can't actually see trackside
> > workers who haven't reacted to the oncoming train.
[big snip]> Totally accept what your saying, but the lights were in
drastic need of
> improvement.
>
> Older headlights in bright day light are virtually invisable, the (ever
> decreasing sized) Yellow End is more noticable.
>
> 158's? Terrible! The grime on the front lens doesnt help.

I agree, but the "intermediate" type - much brighter headlights fitted
to the original holders - were noticeably brighter (too bright in the
case of some units, 153.325 being a case in point).

The new group standard headlights, as per Voyagers and Freightliner
66s, are simply appalling.

> The 3rd cyclops lamp is a waste of time on 170's. The glare from the
> orange destination indicator is better.

That's only a marker light, although I really don't know why they
started using them unless they were copying the European standard
lighting pattern.


> Dipped headlights sounds like a great idea, so I guess that rules them
> out then.

Hey, I'm the cynic here. ;-)

Signature

Ross, a.k.a.
Prof. E. Scrooge, CT, 153 & bar, Doctor of Cynicism (U. Life)

Marratxi - 29 Mar 2005 21:59 GMT
> [...]
> > Headlights aren't for the drivers benefit, they are for trackside workers to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Am I bitter about this? Yes, I am. And so are a lot of other train
> drivers.

Would polaroid glasses help ? Certainly would if the headlamp beams were
polarised at 90 degrees.
Regardz,
Baz
Clive D. W. Feather - 30 Mar 2005 17:03 GMT
>> Headlights aren't for the drivers benefit, they are for trackside workers to
>> see a train coming at night and get out of the way before being squashed!
>
>So they tell us.

Um, that used to be the case, yes. But it's my understanding that at
some point there was a change of philosophy, with - in particular - the
headlamps being bright enough that retro-reflective signs could be used
instead of lighting them all.

Signature

Clive D.W. Feather                       | Home: <clive@davros.org>
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work)             | Web:  <http://www.davros.org>
Fax: +44 870 051 9937                    | Work: <clive@demon.net>
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:  <clive@davros.org>

John Tattersall - 29 Mar 2005 18:08 GMT
>> >> Boy racer styling!
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> only difference you'll see is when they are lit. Maybe this is a way
> for GNER depot staff to readily ID the modified one's more easily?

No they haven't. FGW have done a like-for-like replacement of the marker and
tail lights with LEDs, but the headlights are the same. GNER had replaced
the tail lights with LEDs a few years back, but the new mod is a complete
replacement, with new headlights and combined marker/tail LEDs.
jon.porter1@lycosmax.co.uk - 30 Mar 2005 21:07 GMT
> >> >> Boy racer styling!
> >> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> the tail lights with LEDs a few years back, but the new mod is a complete
> replacement, with new headlights and combined marker/tail LEDs.

Yes you're right, the full replacement has only been done on two so
far. I'd assumed it was fleetwide following the trials last year
leading to the LED mods takin place. I assume after the two trial
vehicles it will be fitted. The fitment trial ruled out any
re-modelling of the front end, as per the MML examples, but the two
trial power cars do look a little different in this area from what I
have seen of them.
Joe - 29 Mar 2005 20:31 GMT
> >> Boy racer styling!
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Have to agree here, it looks bloody awful!

Oh no, It looks bloody marvellous. Hope the rest of the train benefits from
an upgrade.
Marratxi - 29 Mar 2005 22:02 GMT
> >> Boy racer styling!
> >> I wondered why the driver was sporting a Burberry baseball cap...
> > Looks bloody hideous to me!
>
> Have to agree here, it looks bloody awful!

Any chance of somebody posting photos to a.b.p.r. ?
Cheerz,
Baz
Adam - 30 Mar 2005 19:52 GMT
> Any chance of somebody posting photos to a.b.p.r. ?
> Cheerz,
> Baz

Consider it done! I have resisted the temptation to add furry dice and blue
neon lights under the fueltanks!

Adam
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.