> Hi folks
>
> Just wondering if someone out there knows the story of the life of these
> lovely little models?
A model of no known prototype? Par for the course.
Ken.
kim - 28 Sep 2005 17:42 GMT
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Just wondering if someone out there knows the story of the life of these
>> lovely little models?
>>
> A model of no known prototype? Par for the course.
Was it not released originally as a BR engineering coach in departmental
green ie: not meant to represent any particular company design?
(kim)
John Turner - 28 Sep 2005 18:03 GMT
> Was it not released originally as a BR engineering coach in departmental
> green ie: not meant to represent any particular company design?
Originally released in GWR chocolate & cream if I remember correctly. It
was later released in both olive green and black livery represting a
departmental coach.
John.
Ken Parkes - 28 Sep 2005 21:24 GMT
>> Was it not released originally as a BR engineering coach in departmental
>> green ie: not meant to represent any particular company design?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> John.
That's right. I was new to the hobby and bought two to run behind a
pannier I was building. Found out a few months later they were imaginary,
so hacked them into three, four wheelers, also slightly non-proto, but
better looking.
Ken.
ab - 28 Sep 2005 21:59 GMT
>Originally released in GWR chocolate & cream if I remember correctly. It
>was later released in both olive green and black livery represting a
>departmental coach.
On a related subject, anyone know a source (preferably cheap) of
replacement bogies for these?
I recently acquired a few of these coaches which have had the bogies
replaced with metal EM (or some such) bogies, and would like to be
able to run them on my bog-standard OO.
(ab)
> The ones I am most interested in buying are the one with more highly
> detailed paintwork in LMS and GWR.
These are longer than the original Tri-ang releases, but do not have the
raised panel beading, it being represented by the more complex painting as
you suggest. A real case of a retrograde step by Hornby in my opinion.
John.
mindesign - 28 Sep 2005 21:56 GMT
LOL all I know is I like what I think of as the "later" offering, which is
usually in GWR livery and sports well detailed paintwork.
I think they're cute and should look great behind my earlier locos. I guess
I have 15 of them in LNER and LMS liveries, as well as a couple of Ratio
kitbuilt ones - at least I think they're ratio kits
Thanks all
Steve
>> The ones I am most interested in buying are the one with more highly
>> detailed paintwork in LMS and GWR.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> John.
Bill Davies - 28 Sep 2005 23:33 GMT
> These are longer than the original Tri-ang releases, but do not have the
> raised panel beading, it being represented by the more complex painting as
> you suggest. A real case of a retrograde step by Hornby in my opinion.
I was a teenager when these were first released, they were a huge
disappointment to me as the pre-production mockups showed full panelling.
From memory, the Triang coaches matched plans of some GWR clerestory
diagrams reaonably well, but were shortened by a few panels, I'm afraid I
can't remember which diagrams they matched most closely (I last looked into
this over 20 years ago). A cut and shut could produce a reasonably accurate
model, but is it really worth it when there are other options in kit form?
Cheers,
Bill.