Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

fox, replica or modelmaster ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Model Depot - 30 Jul 2006 21:42 GMT
Which transfers are better / best
Fox, Replica, or modelmaster ?
kindest regards
Simon
http://www.modeldepot.co.uk
John Turner - 31 Jul 2006 00:45 GMT
> Which transfers are better / best
> Fox, Replica, or modelmaster ?

In my opinion HMRS Pressfix or Methfix - but the range is limited.

John.
Paul Boyd - 31 Jul 2006 07:47 GMT
John Turner said the following on 31/07/2006 00:45:

> In my opinion HMRS Pressfix or Methfix - but the range is limited.

Seconded.  Methfix first, then Pressfix, then waterslide.

Signature

Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

Nick Palette - 31 Jul 2006 09:24 GMT
If it has to be waterslide, Modelmasters are best in my opinion (and
cheaper!)

> John Turner said the following on 31/07/2006 00:45:
>
>> In my opinion HMRS Pressfix or Methfix - but the range is limited.
>
> Seconded.  Methfix first, then Pressfix, then waterslide.
John Nuttall - 31 Jul 2006 11:46 GMT
> If it has to be waterslide, Modelmasters are best in my opinion (and
> cheaper!)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>> Seconded.  Methfix first, then Pressfix, then waterslide.

I find the carrier film on Modelmasters somewhat on the thick side. I've no
experience of Fox or Replica.

As others have said, first choice is Methfix or Pressfix (but what about the
late lamented Woodhead range?).

Signature

Regards

John

Wolf Kirchmeir - 31 Jul 2006 13:36 GMT
[...]

> I find the carrier film on Modelmasters somewhat on the thick side. I've no
> experience of Fox or Replica.
>
> As others have said, first choice is Methfix or Pressfix (but what about the
> late lamented Woodhead range?).

Walthers' Solvaset or similar dissolves the film, and bonds it to the
paint. It's a mix of alcohols and water. Works very nicely: two or three
applications and gentle washing after it's dried makes the decal
disappear, even on flat paint.

"Methfix" -- does that mean that methylated spirits are used to fix the
decal? If so, Solvaset would in effect make a Methfix out of a
waterslide decal.

HTH
John Turner - 31 Jul 2006 14:56 GMT
> Walthers' Solvaset or similar dissolves the film, and bonds it to the
> paint. It's a mix of alcohols and water. Works very nicely: two or three
> applications and gentle washing after it's dried makes the decal
> disappear, even on flat paint.

Yes but it only works really effectively on the extremely thin decal film
used on your side of the pond.  Here you could almost double-glaze a house
with the decal film most of the major waterslide transfer makers use -
really poor quality compared with the American products.

John.
Paul Boyd - 31 Jul 2006 15:06 GMT
John Turner said the following on 31/07/2006 14:56:

> Yes but it only works really effectively on the extremely thin decal film
> used on your side of the pond.  Here you could almost double-glaze a house
> with the decal film most of the major waterslide transfer makers use -
> really poor quality compared with the American products.

Those of us who print our own decals use American products for just that
reason. (Tango Papa Decals, for instance)  I know that John Isherwood
(Cambridge Custom Transfers) uses a very thin decal film, so if his
products suit, the OP might like to consider him.

Signature

Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

cctransuk - 31 Jul 2006 18:34 GMT
> Those of us who print our own decals use American products for just that
> reason.

> I know that John Isherwood (Cambridge Custom Transfers) uses a very thin decal film...

I do indeed - but it's of UK manufacture and *very* thin.

It is a little-known fact that, worldwide, most (all?) waterslide paper
is produced here in the UK by Tullis Russell. Hence the standard batch
labelling on the back, regardless of decal supplier.

Waterslide paper as produced by Tullis Russell is carrier paper with a
water solvent adhesive film. Decal producers screen-print the varnish
carrier film, and its thickness is a function of the size of screen
used.

My UK screen-printer uses an extremely fine screen, and the resultant
carrier film is very thin indeed. My customers will confirm that it
readily conforms to detail, needing decal fixing solutions only in the
most extreme of cases.

Regards,
John Isherwood,
Cambridge Custom Transfers.
http://www.cctrans.freeserve.co.uk/
Piemanlarger - 31 Jul 2006 12:05 GMT
>> Which transfers are better / best
>> Fox, Replica, or modelmaster ?
>
> In my opinion HMRS Pressfix

HMRS presfix are excllent transfers.

However, as to what is the best, it really depends what you are
re-numbering. Some colour matches are better than others.

or Methfix - but the range is limited.

> John.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.