Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wheel depth on older models.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 13:23 GMT
Firstly, thanks to all for their input on my first posting here, it was
a great deal of help.

As I'm starting out with nothing, and have limited funds, I have been
doing a fair bit of looking on eBay (but have spotted the over-priced
parts, that can be got just as cheap in stores).

Anyway, my kit is gradually building up for my rather ambitious plan for
a double layer layout.

The Princess Elizabeth 4-6-2 I ordered has now arrived, and it does need
a bit of sprucing up, but seems in fair order. It does at least work
anyway. However, I have had some bother with this loco, in that it only
runs very sporadically, and has poor traction. The little Caledonian
0-4-0 I got with my starter kit runs very well though, and there are no
dead spots on the track when running it.

I also noticed the 4-6-2 was jumping a little going over the points.
Further investigation finds that the wheels are deeper in the groove
than the newer model, and are fouling on the guides in the latest
points. Of course it is an old Tri-ang model. I also find that it does
rub on the sleepers in the track too, which happens on the new track, as
well as some older stuff I got.

I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
newer model.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

mr lim - 24 Jul 2007 13:30 GMT
> I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
> later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
> newer model.

Yep  you are, much the easiest is a newer model
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 13:51 GMT
> > I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
> > later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
> > newer model.
>
> Yep  you are, much the easiest is a newer model

I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this one.

Cheers.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

estarriol - 24 Jul 2007 13:59 GMT
>> > I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
>> > later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Cheers.

It depends, it would be a good exercise in wheel changing, as if you
buggered it up, it was only a £10 model you have broken, and it could sit
static in a siding somewhere as colour.

But if you want to get up and running, the new Hornbys, are fine models in
there own right.
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 16:19 GMT
> > I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
> > replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this one.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> buggered it up, it was only a £10 model you have broken, and it could sit
> static in a siding somewhere as colour.

Well, if it comes to it, I might even try taking them down a bit, it's
only the flanges that are too deep.

> But if you want to get up and running, the new Hornbys, are fine models in
> there own right.

Yes, looks like it's going to be the way to go.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

kim - 24 Jul 2007 16:39 GMT
>> > I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
>> > replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Well, if it comes to it, I might even try taking them down a bit, it's
> only the flanges that are too deep.

I think you'll find the flat bits that rest on the rails are a bit too wide
as well?

(kim)
Christopher A.Lee - 24 Jul 2007 17:09 GMT
>>> > I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
>>> > replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>I think you'll find the flat bits that rest on the rails are a bit too wide
>as well?

That would ceratinly give a back-to-back distance the points wouldn't
like.

>(kim)
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 17:34 GMT
> >> > I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
> >> > replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I think you'll find the flat bits that rest on the rails are a bit too wide
> as well?

OK, fair enough. I'm going to rest this one up in a siding for now.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Wolf - 24 Jul 2007 17:08 GMT
>>> I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
>>> replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this one.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Well, if it comes to it, I might even try taking them down a bit, it's
> only the flanges that are too deep.

You will find that the back-to-back measurement of the wheelsets will
also be off, probably enough to impair smooth running through the
points. The key dimensions are at the frog, where the check rails
prevent the wheels from going up the wrong side. Wheel and track
dimensions must be adapted to each other for smooth running.

But don't let this deter you. It's worth a try. If you are using code
100 Peco universal points, the engine will likely negotiate the points
well enough, albeit not perfectly.

>> But if you want to get up and running, the new Hornbys, are fine models in
>> there own right.
>
> Yes, looks like it's going to be the way to go.

Just keep in mind that after the initial expenses, model railways are
cheaper than smoking, healthier, less likely to cause wrinkling of the
nose by your nearest and dearest, and you have something to show for
your money. ;-)

Signature

Wolf
'Just because it's true doesn't mean it's the right answer.'

Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 17:34 GMT
> > Well, if it comes to it, I might even try taking them down a bit, it's
> > only the flanges that are too deep.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 100 Peco universal points, the engine will likely negotiate the points
> well enough, albeit not perfectly.

Well, I gather a new engine is cheaper than replacing all my points!

Oh well, it's my birthday soon ;-)

> >> But if you want to get up and running, the new Hornbys, are fine models in
> >> there own right.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> nose by your nearest and dearest, and you have something to show for
> your money. ;-)

Indeed, it was actually a toss up between the track and a tropical fish
tank (again). I hoped the track would be cheaper in the long run
(maybe!).

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

simon - 24 Jul 2007 23:57 GMT
> Oh well, it's my birthday soon ;-)

Be careful what you get. Consider modern big engines (4-6-0 and greater)
will not run on 1st radius track. So find out about track geometry first -
peco catalog one of best sources of basic info.

Then when you chose your engine consider the period, geographical area and
hence livery you are most interested in. Otherwise you may be sitting there
in years to come with a very nice flying scotsman in BR green with late
crest next to a much nicer LMS red Princess and Duchess.
Although of course its your layout, run whatever !

>> >> But if you want to get up and running, the new Hornbys, are fine
>> >> models in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> tank (again). I hoped the track would be cheaper in the long run
> (maybe!).

Nope, but you can buy and build and do lots of things over many many years
and have lots of fun doing it as well as learning about the hobby.

Cheers,
Simon
Andy Hewitt - 25 Jul 2007 10:11 GMT
> > Oh well, it's my birthday soon ;-)
> >
> Be careful what you get. Consider modern big engines (4-6-0 and greater)
> will not run on 1st radius track. So find out about track geometry first -
> peco catalog one of best sources of basic info.

Yes, I had spotted that one, my layout does allow for a couple of runs
of larger radius. I plan to run the 0-4-0 on the inner track.

I have even added a siding off the outer loop as well.

> Then when you chose your engine consider the period, geographical area and
> hence livery you are most interested in. Otherwise you may be sitting there
> in years to come with a very nice flying scotsman in BR green with late
> crest next to a much nicer LMS red Princess and Duchess.
> Although of course its your layout, run whatever !

Yes, I was looking to go for mostly pre-war models, and as you mention,
possibly a set of LMS locos. However, my aim is to stick with steam, as
this is what I am most interested in.

The track is fictional, so I might even just make it a 'preserved line'
layout, where a mixture won't hurt.

> >> >> But if you want to get up and running, the new Hornbys, are fine
> >> >> models in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Nope, but you can buy and build and do lots of things over many many years
> and have lots of fun doing it as well as learning about the hobby.

Aye, that's the plan, and I'm sure I'll make plenty more mistakes too
;-)

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Wolf - 24 Jul 2007 14:39 GMT
>>> I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
>>> later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Cheers.

IMO, No. For one thing AFAIK there aren't any cheap, drop-in conversion
wheels. There is an outfit whose name I forget (I found it by googling)
from whom I bought custom turned replacement wheels for a Lima GWR
diesel car. RP25 profile, very nice, but they cost more than the model.
Also, they showed up the poor motor, which is the next item on the list.
It's never ending, like maintaining your house and garden. ;-)

Also, the Triang model is not up to modern standards in running gear,
mechanism, or body detail. If you like it (presumably is has some
pleasant associations for you), make a small display case, and put it up
on the mantel or the wall. Buddy of mine made a wall-mounted display
case about 18"x24" out of offcuts of mahogany and oak trim he happened
to have, with a clear plastic front. Three shelves in it with tracks
mounted on them.  He glued pieces of printed backscene behind the
shelves, a different scene for each level. Very decorative.

HTH

Signature

Wolf
'Just because it's true doesn't mean it's the right answer.'

Paul Boyd - 24 Jul 2007 15:19 GMT
Wolf said the following on 24/07/2007 14:39:
> There is an outfit whose name I forget (I found it by googling)
> from whom I bought custom turned replacement wheels for a Lima GWR
> diesel car. RP25 profile, very nice, but they cost more than the model.

You're probably thinking of Ultrascale.  They're not exactly custom
turned, but they're not exactly off-the shelf either :-)

Signature

Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

Wolf - 24 Jul 2007 15:40 GMT
> Wolf said the following on 24/07/2007 14:39:
>> There is an outfit whose name I forget (I found it by googling) from
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You're probably thinking of Ultrascale.  They're not exactly custom
> turned, but they're not exactly off-the shelf either :-)

Yes, that's it. They said to allow up to six weeks for delivery, so I
inferred that they made up the wheels in batches. Small batches,
probably. ;-)

Excellent product, though. Includes axle-mounted gears as required. Just
dropped in. Well worth the money IMO.

Signature

Wolf
'Just because it's true doesn't mean it's the right answer.'

Paul Boyd - 25 Jul 2007 07:57 GMT
Wolf said the following on 24/07/2007 15:40:

> Yes, that's it. They said to allow up to six weeks for delivery, so I
> inferred that they made up the wheels in batches. Small batches,
> probably. ;-)

It's now up to six *months* delivery :-(

> Excellent product, though. Includes axle-mounted gears as required. Just
> dropped in. Well worth the money IMO.

They are, and will be even better if they go ahead with plans to
introduce a bigger range of steel tyres.

Signature

Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

Christopher A.Lee - 24 Jul 2007 16:24 GMT
>Wolf said the following on 24/07/2007 14:39:
>> There is an outfit whose name I forget (I found it by googling)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>You're probably thinking of Ultrascale.  They're not exactly custom
>turned, but they're not exactly off-the shelf either :-)

They were however a deliberate direct replacement.
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 16:19 GMT
> >>> I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
> >>> later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Also, they showed up the poor motor, which is the next item on the list.
> It's never ending, like maintaining your house and garden. ;-)

Aye, I can see that with this one anyway. Oh well, nothing ventured, as
they say :-)

I guess I've learnt something from this, as I didn't realise there were
different depths of track available. I know there is for Scalextric, but
I have the deeper grooves in the set I have, so older cars will run on
it.

> Also, the Triang model is not up to modern standards in running gear,
> mechanism, or body detail. If you like it (presumably is has some
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> mounted on them.  He glued pieces of printed backscene behind the
> shelves, a different scene for each level. Very decorative.

I don't think I'd go that far, it doesn't actually have any special
meaning for me, other than I wanted a large loco. I think I'll probably
just paint it up a bit, and stick it in a siding somewhere.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

MartinS - 24 Jul 2007 18:04 GMT
<snip>

> I don't think I'd go that far, it doesn't actually have any special
> meaning for me, other than I wanted a large loco. I think I'll probably
> just paint it up a bit, and stick it in a siding somewhere.

You could remove some bits and weather it so that it looks like a rusting
hulk.  ;-)

I notice that the local Wal-Mart is now selling a selection of 1:24 model
cars decorated to look like they belong in a junk yard.

Signature

Martin S.

Andy Hewitt - 25 Jul 2007 10:11 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You could remove some bits and weather it so that it looks like a rusting
> hulk.  ;-)

Bit of a shame with a Princess Royal class. I might still plan to paint
it in LMS colours, and stick it on a display only layout.

> I notice that the local Wal-Mart is now selling a selection of 1:24 model
> cars decorated to look like they belong in a junk yard.

Hmm, yes the weathered stuff is OK, except you are kind of stuck with
that look, and 1:24 would look a little odd surely :-)

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

mr lim - 25 Jul 2007 11:30 GMT
> > I notice that the local Wal-Mart is now selling a selection of 1:24 model
> > cars decorated to look like they belong in a junk yard.
>
> Hmm, yes the weathered stuff is OK, except you are kind of stuck with
> that look, and 1:24 would look a little odd surely :-)

More than a little odd , miles out of scale
Andy Hewitt - 25 Jul 2007 14:51 GMT
> > > I notice that the local Wal-Mart is now selling a selection of 1:24 model
> > > cars decorated to look like they belong in a junk yard.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> More than a little odd , miles out of scale

Er, yes, that was what I was trying to get at :-)

I did build those old Airfix 1:24 Spitfire and Hurricane kits, and they
are huge.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Christopher A.Lee - 24 Jul 2007 15:51 GMT
>> > I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
>> > later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>I will probably end up doing that. However, is it cost effective to
>replace the wheels anyway? Bearing in mind I only paid £10 for this one.

Probably not. I doubt standard 4mm scale axles will be a direct
replacement.

>Cheers.
Christopher A.Lee - 24 Jul 2007 15:48 GMT
>Firstly, thanks to all for their input on my first posting here, it was
>a great deal of help.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
>newer model.

What track are you using?

Code 100 Peco Streamline has been around a long time, dating back to
the days of deep flanges.
kim - 24 Jul 2007 15:53 GMT
>>Firstly, thanks to all for their input on my first posting here, it was
>>a great deal of help.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Code 100 Peco Streamline has been around a long time, dating back to
> the days of deep flanges.

Triang was originally Code 140.

(kim)
Christopher A.Lee - 24 Jul 2007 16:31 GMT
>>>Firstly, thanks to all for their input on my first posting here, it was
>>>a great deal of help.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
>Triang was originally Code 140.

I know, but Streamline has been around since the days of Triang Hornby
and claimed to be universal. I don't know how they did it, because I
use matching track and wheel standards in O gauge.

In my OO days I used SMP Scaleway which handled over scale flanges by
cutting back the inside of the chairs, which looked right from
outside. The chairs also raised the code 75 rail off the sleepers so
there was room for oversize flanges.

Does Peco do anything like this?

>(kim)
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 16:19 GMT
[..]
> >I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
> >later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Code 100 Peco Streamline has been around a long time, dating back to
> the days of deep flanges.

I'm using whatever came with the Caledonian 0-4-0 set.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Christopher A.Lee - 24 Jul 2007 16:47 GMT
>[..]
>> >I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>I'm using whatever came with the Caledonian 0-4-0 set.

That's probably code 100 train set track, not even universal.
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 17:34 GMT
> >[..]
> >> >I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> That's probably code 100 train set track, not even universal.

Most likely. I didn't know there were choices! Still, I do now.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

kim - 24 Jul 2007 17:30 GMT
> [..]
>> >I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I'm using whatever came with the Caledonian 0-4-0 set.

My Triang Class 31 diesel won't run properly on Hornby Series 6 track. It
just bounces along the sleeper chairs like a demented kangaroo with blue
sparks flying off the wheels and a strong smell of ozone in the air. A
replacement set of wheels is available but there are so many other things
wrong with the model it's easier to just buy a new one.

(kim)
Andy Hewitt - 24 Jul 2007 17:35 GMT
> > [..]
> >> >I suppose I'm looking at a couple of solutions; Change the wheels for
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> just bounces along the sleeper chairs like a demented kangaroo with blue
> sparks flying off the wheels and a strong smell of ozone in the air.

Yeah, that's what it's doing.

> A
> replacement set of wheels is available but there are so many other things
> wrong with the model it's easier to just buy a new one.

Yup, have now come to that conclusion.

Cheers.

Signature

Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>

Paul Boyd - 25 Jul 2007 07:59 GMT
kim said the following on 24/07/2007 17:30:

> ... a strong smell of ozone in the air ...

That suddenly took me back a number of years :-)

Signature

Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

MartinS - 27 Jul 2007 05:36 GMT
> kim said the following on 24/07/2007 17:30:
>
>> ... a strong smell of ozone in the air ...
>
> That suddenly took me back a number of years :-)

And me to my first trip on the Tube in 1951...

Signature

Martin S.

John Turner - 24 Jul 2007 17:46 GMT
> I also noticed the 4-6-2 was jumping a little going over the points.
> Further investigation finds that the wheels are deeper in the groove
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> later design, modify the wheels so they fit, or forget it and buy a
> newer model.

I think you'll find the cost of changing wheels and other requirements will
make such a conversion uneconomic.

John.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.