Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bachmann 2MT 2-6-0 and (not) DCC

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
cctransuk - 26 Jul 2007 12:52 GMT
I have just received my Bachmann Mickey Mouse, and very nice it is
too!

As noted in the model press, the loco / tender gap is huge as
delivered,but a shorter tender coupling link is provided - well done
Bachmann.

Also evident from the press photos are the very prominent four wires
linking loco to tender, (via some *very* nice micro plugs and
sockets), so that a DCC chip can be located in the tender.

As I have no intention of utilising DCC now or in the future, and
since there are no tender pick-ups, I can dispense with the loco -
tender wiring.

There are two red wires and two black wires; can anyone with DCC
expertise tell me which wires should be joined within the loco and
which can be dispensed with?

Thanks in anticipation,
John Isherwood.
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 26 Jul 2007 14:53 GMT
> I have just received my Bachmann Mickey Mouse, and very nice it is
> too!
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> expertise tell me which wires should be joined within the loco and
> which can be dispensed with?

No, no one can, not without knowing where they are connected, since
DCC uses red and black for track pickup and orange and grey for the
motor, so Bachmann didn't do a very good job here.

If there's a standard DCC socket in the tender then you can work out
the connections from RP-9.1.1:

http://www.nmra.org/standards/DCC/standards_rps/rp911.html

MBQ
cctransuk - 26 Jul 2007 17:27 GMT
Many thanks - I'll have the loco and tender bodies off on Saturday and
work it out.

Regards,
John isherwood.
simon - 26 Jul 2007 22:09 GMT
>> I have just received my Bachmann Mickey Mouse, and very nice it is
>> too!
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> MBQ

Do they not just refer to the chip connectors. What is used everywhere else
is not defined - true it would be nice though.

Presume they are 2 from the track pickups and 2 for the motor so they just
want connecting to each other.
Simple, cut all then use a meter connected between one side of wheels and
test each wire in turn. Repeat for the other side. That gives the 2 pickups.
Connect each to one of the remaning wires and see if loco goes the usual
direction and swap if dont.

Cheers,
Simon
kim - 27 Jul 2007 13:33 GMT
>> I have just received my Bachmann Mickey Mouse, and very nice it is
>> too!
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> http://www.nmra.org/standards/DCC/standards_rps/rp911.html

According to Bachmann's catalogue, it's an "8-pin" socket!

This presumably rules out any sound-fitted version in the future?

(kim)
John Turner - 26 Jul 2007 22:39 GMT
> There are two red wires and two black wires; can anyone with DCC
> expertise tell me which wires should be joined within the loco and
> which can be dispensed with?

I think this follows standard Bachmann USA practice, in which case the
mini-plug which carries just two wires is transferring +ve & -ve current
picked up from the loco power collectors to the DCC socket in the tender.
If you connect these direct to the motor instead of two of the four wires
coming from the DCC socket that should circumvent the wiring in tender
altogether.

Another option thought might be to fit additional pick-ups to the tender and
use some of the exiting wiring to transfer this back to the motor in the
loco.

John.
Ian J. - 27 Jul 2007 00:53 GMT
>> There are two red wires and two black wires; can anyone with DCC
>> expertise tell me which wires should be joined within the loco and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> John.

Which makes me think - Hornby have successfully had pickups on the tender
for some time now, but Bachmann seem to have chosen not to follow suit. I
must admit I've rarely had any issues with Bachmann tender locos having
pickup trouble, so is it just a case that Hornby's tender locos are
'over-engineered'?

Ian J.
John Turner - 27 Jul 2007 13:27 GMT
> Which makes me think - Hornby have successfully had pickups on the tender
> for some time now, but Bachmann seem to have chosen not to follow suit. I
> must admit I've rarely had any issues with Bachmann tender locos having
> pickup trouble, so is it just a case that Hornby's tender locos are
> 'over-engineered'?

I'd be inclined to suggest that the pick-ups on Hornby tender locos are
UNDER-engineered, and that the tender pick-ups are necessary.  Certainly
they run *much* better when the tender is attached.

John.
simon - 28 Jul 2007 01:11 GMT
>> Which makes me think - Hornby have successfully had pickups on the tender
>> for some time now, but Bachmann seem to have chosen not to follow suit. I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> John.

Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.
One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over which
current is collected. But as theres a max of 3 wheels per vehicle actually
touching the rails in a non suspension vehicle then tender pickups will at
least double the number of contact points.

Cheers,
Simon

Of the 3 yes it should be 1 on side and 2 on the other but if you have sharp
curves and high speed trains then it doesnt have to be.
Christopher A.Lee - 28 Jul 2007 02:22 GMT
>>> Which makes me think - Hornby have successfully had pickups on the tender
>>> for some time now, but Bachmann seem to have chosen not to follow suit. I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>touching the rails in a non suspension vehicle then tender pickups will at
>least double the number of contact points.

It extends the flexible wheelbase so you will always have at least two
wheels on each side picking up current.
>Cheers,
>Simon
>
>Of the 3 yes it should be 1 on side and 2 on the other but if you have sharp
>curves and high speed trains then it doesnt have to be.
Greg Procter - 28 Jul 2007 05:41 GMT
> >> Which makes me think - Hornby have successfully had pickups on the tender
> >> for some time now, but Bachmann seem to have chosen not to follow suit. I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> touching the rails in a non suspension vehicle then tender pickups will at
> least double the number of contact points.

Given 3 wheels touching on any given loco, one will be on one rail, two
on the other. That gives us a loco dependant on a single pickup point
for traction current! Dead frog turnouts almost guarentee the loco will
stall at shunting speeds. A rocking axle or suspension doubles that to
two, which by my reckoning gives a decent chance for a loco to pass dead
frogs IF wheels and rails are clean.
A rigid loco and a rigid tender with pickup gives us between 2-4 or 3-3
pickup points. That still leaves us relying totally on _2_ pickup points
for traction current, which given the average model railway environment
is something of a gamble!

Greg.P.
John Turner - 28 Jul 2007 08:39 GMT
> Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.
> One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over which
> current is collected.

Indeed, which is why I suggested to John Isherwood that he might use ALL of
the wiring provided with the Bachmann Ivatt to add pick-ups to the tender.

I've no experience with Bachmann 'kettles' of this being necessary, but it
might potentially produce better running, whereas there have been any number
of instances with recent Hornby locos which I've tested prior to sale that
have very definitely NEEDED the tender to be attached to get optimum
performance.

That's all I'm saying, but have you seen the way some of the pick-ups are
fitted to Hornby locos?  They rely on the chassis keeper plate to hold them
in place.  Remove the keeper plate & they literally fall off.

John.
Ian J. - 28 Jul 2007 10:13 GMT
>> Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.
>> One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over which
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> John.

Funny that. In my experience you're absolutely right. What's even more weird
is that I have Hornby MNs that have sprung rear axles, yet they still need
the tender for optimum pick up, but the Bachmann tender locos don't have
such a problem. What are Bachmann doing right that Hornby are doing wrong,
when Hornby's approach *appears* to be correct? (that was a rhetorical
question, btw)

Ian J.
simon - 28 Jul 2007 23:35 GMT
>>> Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.
>>> One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Ian J.
Always worth while doing a quick check that pickups clean esp paint free and
do touch where they should.

Cheers,
Simon
John Turner - 29 Jul 2007 19:31 GMT
> Always worth while doing a quick check that pickups clean esp paint free
> and do touch where they should.

Agreed absolutely, but the first time I attempted to adjust the pick-ups (on
a Black 5 from memory) I wanted ease of access to allow me to bend three (of
six) into more reliable contact with the back of the wheel, and when I
removed the keeper plate the pick-ups from both sides of the chassis just
fell away.  They're not 'fixed' in the accepted sense, but rely on the
keeper plate to hold them in position against a brass shim which has the
wires attached which run to the motor.

I was a bugger of a job to position to position and refit the two sets of
pick-ups and hold the whole shooting match in place whilst the keeper plate
was screwed into position.  Further adjustment is practically impossible.
Not a very clever design in my opinion, and it's possible that those in the
factory who have to assemble this rig, may not get the positioning spot on
with consequent indifferent running until the tender is attached.

John.
simon - 29 Jul 2007 21:33 GMT
>> Always worth while doing a quick check that pickups clean esp paint free
>> and do touch where they should.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> John.
Was wondering why you removed the keeper plate, have never done that cos of
pickups. When have been thoroughly fed up with the 6 handed job of putting
it back have resorted to the thin tape or even a tiny spot of super glue.

CHeers,
Simon
John Turner - 30 Jul 2007 00:27 GMT
> Was wondering why you removed the keeper plate, have never done that cos
> of pickups.

It's difficult to accurately 'bend' a wiper pick-up when in situ behind a
wheel.  My intention was to move it away from the wheel, adjust it and then
reposition - a system I've used for donkey's years, and one I still use
occasionally with Bachmann locos.

> When have been thoroughly fed up with the 6 handed job of putting it back
> have resorted to the thin tape or even a tiny spot of super glue.

Yup, but not so easy with Hornby pick-ups as both are effective insulators,
and in this scenario electrical continuity relies on the physical contact
between pick-up and the small shim under the keeper plate.

John.
simon - 30 Jul 2007 22:16 GMT
>> Was wondering why you removed the keeper plate, have never done that cos
>> of pickups.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> John.
Appreciate thats the case with the older locos with less flexible pickups
and your method is the perfect one. Butt modern ones with phos..bronze tend
to be better sprung with a knob near the end. Find they can be pressed
closer to the wheel and with the wheel at its outermost position it is less
critical that they be perfect. Tis very important to clean that knob though.

Cheers,
Simon
MartinS - 31 Jul 2007 00:15 GMT
> "John Turner" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> outermost position it is less critical that they be perfect. Tis very
> important to clean that knob though.

Yes, it's very important to keep your knob clean.

Signature

Martin S.

Christopher A.Lee - 31 Jul 2007 00:16 GMT
>> "John Turner" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>Yes, it's very important to keep your knob clean.

As Lister would say.... "Smeghead".
simon - 28 Jul 2007 23:34 GMT
>> Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.

Sorry, these were non sequetur statements should have been a gap !

>> One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over which
>> current is collected.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> John.
I will admit theres a tendancy for hornby locos to require contacts
re-sited - ie push in a bit. Have had to do it to odd bachmann one as well -
but got lots less of them.
My new bachmann Fairburn tank runs now have bent one of drain pipes up a
bit. Noticed wheel B2B varies considerably in drivers from front to back -
explains why it sounds a bit heavy bouncing through points.
Perhaps the bounce cleans the track so thats why they seem to need fewer
pickups ?

Cheers,
Simon
Kevin Martin - 28 Jul 2007 14:05 GMT
> Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.
> One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over which
> current is collected. But as theres a max of 3 wheels per vehicle actually
> touching the rails in a non suspension vehicle then tender pickups will at
> least double the number of contact points.

Surely a case of the more the merrier. It is not just the overall length
of the pick-ups but the number of them. Logic should also say that the
so called "3 points of contact" is a minimum. The odds are that there
will be more than 3 in contact. So an 0-6-0 tender loco could possibly
have 12 wheel pick-up and would most unlikely stall compared to a sister
model with only 6.

Kevin Martin

Signature

To Reply, delete what is "Not Required" in abbreviated form

simon - 28 Jul 2007 23:26 GMT
> Surely a case of the more the merrier. It is not just the overall length
> of the pick-ups but the number of them. Logic should also say that the so
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Kevin Martin

dont think so, unless wheels and track are an abolutely perfect fit then it
can only be three wheels per vehicle. Compare it with a 4 leg table on a
flat surface. Nearly everywhere you put it you can slide a thin piece of
paper under one leg.

Cheers,
Simon
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2007 08:49 GMT
On Jul 28, 2:05 pm, Kevin Martin <kevinrail...@notreqdoptusnet.com.au>
wrote:

> > Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined statement.
> > One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra length over which
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> will be more than 3 in contact. So an 0-6-0 tender loco could possibly
> have 12 wheel pick-up and would most unlikely stall

It's very unlikely you'll get anything like 12 on a mass-produced
rigid chassis RTR loco and tender.

MBQ
MartinS - 30 Jul 2007 20:24 GMT
>> > Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined
>> > statement. One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> It's very unlikely you'll get anything like 12 on a mass-produced
> rigid chassis RTR loco and tender.

You're assuming there is no flex in the track, and no play in the wheel
bearings. A wheel that does not have its tread on the rail may still make
contact through the flange, espcially on a curve. Coupled driving wheels
are also electrically connected by the coupling rods.

Signature

Martin S.

simon - 30 Jul 2007 22:12 GMT
>>> > Suprisingly I'm not really in agreement with your inclined
>>> > statement. One of the main benefits of tender pickups is the extra
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> contact through the flange, espcially on a curve. Coupled driving wheels
> are also electrically connected by the coupling rods.

Not if they are insulated. have to be carefull with some wheel makes
otherwise you get shorts via coupling rods.

Dont forget wheels are connected via coupling rods to adjacent wheel but
also via a solid axle to their partner. So flex and play can lower one side
but raise the other. Suspect its a 3 dimensional thingy. Thats why said you
need a perfect fit not perfectly flat track and wheels.

Cheers,
Simon
cctransuk - 27 Jul 2007 13:24 GMT
John,

>... the mini-plug which carries just two wires is transferring +ve & -ve current
> picked up from the loco power collectors to the DCC socket in the tender.

As far as I can see, there are two identical miniplugs, each with two
wires; one red and one black.

As someone has pointed out elsewhere, it would be wise to mark which
is which because putting them back in the wrong locations could be
disasterous if the tender is fitted with a DCC chip.

Regards,
John Isherwood.
John Turner - 27 Jul 2007 13:24 GMT
> I think this follows standard Bachmann USA practice, in which case the
> mini-plug which carries just two wires is transferring +ve & -ve current
> picked up from the loco power collectors to the DCC socket in the tender.
> If you connect these direct to the motor instead of two of the four wires
> coming from the DCC socket that should circumvent the wiring in tender
> altogether.

I've since checked and it seems that both sockets only carry two wires,
which of course negates my earlier suggestion - sorry!

John.
Chris Wilson - 27 Jul 2007 23:42 GMT
> Another option thought might be to fit additional pick-ups to the
> tender and use some of the exiting wiring to transfer this back to the
> motor in the loco.

Something I'd echo. As a matter of course all my locos have all wheel pick-
ups (including tenders) and having so modified them (where necessary) I
haven't half seen an improvement in running.

Likewise the "engineers train" I'm currently building has all wheel pick-
ups through-out its length and will have a plug and socket arrangement for
connecting with the loco.

In my book you can never have enough pick-ups - especially as in my case
the layout is in a very dirty garage and my longest (regular) train only
has 6 carriages on a tender loco the additional drag doesn't factor in at
all.

Signature

All the best,

Chris Wilson

email to cwilson at britwar dor co dot uk, reply address is spamtrapped.
http://www.the-dormouse.org The Dormouse Line model railway

jruddy99@googlemail.com - 28 Jul 2007 21:27 GMT
> I have just received my Bachmann Mickey Mouse, and very nice it is
> too!
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Thanks in anticipation,
> John Isherwood.

I'm afraid you can't dispense with either of those two wires. They
aren't anything to do with DCC - cut them and the loco simply won't
work, as it provides the pickups from the tender to the motor.

John
cctransuk - 28 Jul 2007 23:24 GMT
John.

> I'm afraid you can't dispense with either of those two wires. They
> aren't anything to do with DCC - cut them and the loco simply won't
> work, as it provides the pickups from the tender to the motor.

You can - just did it.

Remove the axle keeper-plate on the loco and unsolder the red and blue
wires from the pick-up strips; (noting which is red and which is
black.

Snip the other red and black wires which come from the motor where
they enter the insulating sleeve, strip the ends and solder these to
the pick-up strips instead. Reinstall the keeper-plate.

Remove the tender body and unscrew and dispense with the connecting
sockets and the PCB. Reassemble the tender.

Job done!

Regards,
John Isherwood.
cctransuk - 28 Jul 2007 23:26 GMT
> unsolder the red and blue ....

Should be red and black.

Duhhh!

Regards,
John.
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2007 08:45 GMT
On Jul 28, 9:27 pm, jrudd...@googlemail.com wrote:

> > I have just received my Bachmann Mickey Mouse, and very nice it is
> > too!
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> aren't anything to do with DCC - cut them and the loco simply won't
> work, as it provides the pickups from the tender to the motor.

Why would you need *four* wires for tender pickup?

MBQ
MartinS - 30 Jul 2007 20:19 GMT
>> > Also evident from the press photos are the very prominent four
>> > wires linking loco to tender, (via some *very* nice micro plugs and
>> > sockets), so that a DCC chip can be located in the tender.
>>
> Why would you need *four* wires for tender pickup?

See above.

Signature

Martin S.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.