> I am interested in any reports regarding these kits __
> particularly whether they have sufficient weight. They look so nice
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Regards
Re: Ultra fine scale wheels and commercial code 100 track:
Ultra fine scale wheels means wheels with a different wheel profile
(tire width, flange depth, shape of tread to flange transition, etc.),
and gauge point (where on the tread "gauge" is measured, generally just
before the fillet that connects tread to flange), and back-to-back.
There would probably be little or no trouble running such wheels on
plain track, but turnouts (points) are another matter. Without specs of
Finney's ultra fine scale wheel profile, there's no way of telling. Do
you have those specs? If you do, it's a fairly simple matter to tell
whether the wheels will roll smoothly through the turnouts.
A related matter is curve radii. Depending on how Finney has designed
the chassis, those locos may not like curves tighter than about 24"
radius, and perhaps even larger on the larger locos. Anyonew wqho'se
built one of these kits can advise you on that.
HTH
Peter Abraham said the following on 27/01/2008 18:17:
> I am interested in any reports regarding these kits __
> particularely whether they have sufficient weight. They look so nice
> and cover a range of locos which suit me very well but I would be
> wanting performance too!
I assume you mean Martin Finney kits? They are the dog's wotsits,
although when you ask if they have sufficient weight it makes me wonder
whether you've built this type of kit before. Basically, you weight
them to suit your needs.
> Another question hovers around the use of ultra fine scale
> wheels on code 100 track.
You might also need to check whether Martin Finney kits can actually be
built to OO gauge. I know that some of the high end kits can't be.
Wheels and track standards are very closely tied together, so if you
went for something like Ultrascale OO wheels you might find that it
doesn't run as well on "standard" OO track. This is not intended to be
a criticism of what you want to do, but more to point you in the
direction of things to check out.
If you really do mean Frank Finney, then ignore all the above as I've
never heard of him!

Signature
Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/
Peter Abraham - 28 Jan 2008 09:14 GMT
>Peter Abraham said the following on 27/01/2008 18:17:
>> I am interested in any reports regarding these kits __
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>If you really do mean Frank Finney, then ignore all the above as I've
>never heard of him!
Yes my error! Anno Domini conquers all eventually. I have done a
fair bit of scratch building ( years ago with Bob Brown at Plymouth)
and recently some Comet chassis for Bachmann bodies. The adverts for
MF kits looked attractive, specifically mentioned OO and UF scale
wheels but as these are not supplied it should be ok with the
Romfords. I asked about ballasting as I have no construction details
to hand and some chassis designs do not lend themselves easily to
weighting.
Regards
PS I was probably thinking of Tom Finney and that Preston North End
v. Blackpool match of 1953? (when the UK still had English soccer
players.)
BH Williams - 28 Jan 2008 10:36 GMT
> Peter Abraham said the following on 27/01/2008 18:17:
>> I am interested in any reports regarding these kits __
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> If you really do mean Frank Finney, then ignore all the above as I've
> never heard of him!
Wasn't he the somewhat louche actor who portrayed 'Casanova', or was that
Frank Finlay?
Brian