Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / March 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lionel new O Gauge... Stourbridge Lion

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
chorleydnc@hotmail.com - 23 Mar 2008 00:57 GMT
AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
construction (looked similar) used extensively in Britain (or
elsewhere) and where in GB?.
I know that extensively means a few scattered around.

David
chorleydnc@hotmail.com - 23 Mar 2008 01:17 GMT
On Mar 22, 6:57 pm, "chorley...@hotmail.com" <chorley...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
> American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> David

OK, so I reviewed my sources and Stourbridge Lion and John Bull are
not the same, John Bull being built by Stephenson... question
remains.. where in Britain would that type of 0-4-0 be found.
David
Christopher A. Lee - 23 Mar 2008 02:06 GMT
>On Mar 22, 6:57 pm, "chorley...@hotmail.com" <chorley...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>remains.. where in Britain would that type of 0-4-0 be found.
>David

As delivered John Bull was a standard Stevenson Goods engine and as
such might be found on any of the early railways. I think the
Liverpool and Manchester had some. The pilot truck and cowcatcher, and
the covered tender were American modifications. 0-4-0s like this (as a
design) did not last very long, being superceded by 0-6-0 and 0-4-2
designs. The extra axle allowed a heavier, better running engine - the
0-4-0 was unsteady due to its short wheelbase. in the same way that
the 2-2-0 passenger engines were superceded by the 2-2-2.

Stourbridge Lion was a dead end. It was similar to some of the earlier
Stevenson locomotives but these were already obsolete by the Rainhill
trials in 1829.

Foster Rastrick only built four locomotives. Three for the USA and one
for the Canterbury and Whitstable Railway in England. This one id
preserved:
http://members.virtualtourist.com/m/p/m/72c86/

The caption says Rocket but is wrong. It is the Agenoria at the
National Railway Museum, York.
Andrew Robert Breen - 23 Mar 2008 10:39 GMT
>On Mar 22, 6:57 pm, "chorley...@hotmail.com" <chorley...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>remains.. where in Britain would that type of 0-4-0 be found.
>David

Which one?

_Stourbridge Lion_ was an identical twin to _Agenoria_, now in York Museum
after a long career in industrial service (ended in the 1870s, IIRC), so
"on a colliery line" would be a good answer for her. As to "John Bull",
she's a Stephenson standard product, a "Sampson" type (four-coupled
version of the "Planet" class) - so just about anywhere in the 1830s and
40s...

Signature

Andy Breen ~     Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
        Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
        money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)

oldship@interalpha.couk - 23 Mar 2008 15:01 GMT
>AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
>American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>David

Looking at their on line catalogue I see they have brought the Hall
and Coaches that were produced for a Harry Potter set out as a
Shakespeare Express for 2008. Line 5 of the description will have GWR
worshippers choking.
Any one know how these Lionel Halls shape up, An O gauge set could
make an unusual present for the Nephew.
Must be a limited Market for them, most North Americans will not be
interested in the GWR and most British will not be aware that Lionel
make such a set.  Suspect they are "left over" Harry Potter Stock.

G.harman
Christopher A. Lee - 23 Mar 2008 16:35 GMT
>>AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
>>American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>interested in the GWR and most British will not be aware that Lionel
>make such a set.  Suspect they are "left over" Harry Potter Stock.

Lionel's main market is in the USA where three rail coarse-scale AC
outsells 2-rail by an order of magnitude.

They had relative success with their Thomas sets and I think they
expected the same for Harry Potter.

The whole country likes Thomas - it has been on children's television
here for years. While some shops sold the Hornby Thomas, it wasn't
generally available.

But the religiously conservative parts of the USA don't like Harry
Potter so there is automatically a smaller market. In addition I
suspect that most parents who bought Harry Potter trains bought the
Bachmann OO which was in most model train shops here.

Lionel aren't going to have many 3-rail AC customers in the UK. It's
like going back to the dark ages.

>G.harman
kim - 23 Mar 2008 16:46 GMT
>>> AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
>>> American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> They had relative success with their Thomas sets and I think they
> expected the same for Harry Potter.

Their Thomas was overscale wasn't it, Gauge 1 running on Gauge 0 track?

(kim)
Christopher A. Lee - 23 Mar 2008 16:53 GMT
>>>> AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
>>>> American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Their Thomas was overscale wasn't it, Gauge 1 running on Gauge 0 track?

Percy was way over scale. Thomas not quite so much. But closer to 7mm
than 1/4". My club's layout has a Thomas that was converted to 2-rail
and gets an outing on open days. Visiting kids love it.

>(kim)
oldship@interalpha.couk - 23 Mar 2008 18:01 GMT
>>Looking at their on line catalogue I see they have brought the Hall
>>and Coaches that were produced for a Harry Potter set out as a
>>Shakespeare Express for 2008.

>>Any one know how these Lionel Halls shape up, An O gauge set could
>>make an unusual present for the Nephew.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Lionel's main market is in the USA where three rail coarse-scale AC
>outsells 2-rail by an order of magnitude.

For their market I would think they are good fun. ISTR that back when
Hornby Dublo was for serious people and Tri-ang decided to put some
fun in they took some ideas from Lionel.
We know who won that battle. Strange that those who may have had a
ducking Giraffe car are now the generation purchasing super detailed
models from the Hornby branded successor of Tri-ang.

>Lionel aren't going to have many 3-rail AC customers in the UK. It's
>like going back to the dark ages.

There is a small and growing following though for some Retro style
tinplate trains ,looking at one of the main proponents for such
offerings  http://www.acetrains.com/_index.html I see that some of
their production was capable of AC as well as DC though they seem to
have settled on DC now. Interestingly I see they have a market for
Tenders to upgrade the Lionel product so some collectors must be
acquiring the Lionel offering.
Not a branch of the hobby that would attract me greatly especially
given the prices .That said it is fun watching the old Hornby tin
stuff and the modern retro whiz around a train set at a show. There is
that satisfying rattle and clatter that does not appear from a model
diorama despite the skill and long hours that the constructors have
put in.

G.Harman
Andrew Robert Breen - 24 Mar 2008 00:02 GMT
>>>AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
>>>American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
>>>construction (looked similar) used extensively in Britain (or
>>>elsewhere) and where in GB?.
>>>I know that extensively means a few scattered around.

Amyone got any idea when/if/from whom it might be available in .uk? I know
it'll need adaptation (re-wheeling, re-wiring) to run on FS O is it's
anything like the usual Lionel product, but no-one else is doing anything
like this.

That early 1860s junction between a colliery railway and the main line
(with those new, hyper-modern Sharp, Stewart goods engines) looks like it
might be do-able much sooner than I ever dared hope...

Signature

Andy Breen ~     Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
        Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
        money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)

beamendsltd - 25 Mar 2008 10:15 GMT
> >AKA John Bull, is being produced in "nominal 'O' gauge" for the
> >American market. The question arises: were locomotives of the same
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> G.harman

This came up on the 7mm grup a while back. The engine is quite
accurate, and one poster reckoned it took a couple of hours to
convert to fine scale 2-rail. He'd bought a Hogwarts set, and
put the rest on e-bay - the coaches were terrible by all accounts.

If one were in need of a cheap engine and didn't mind some modding,
this could very well be a good option.

Cheers
Richard

Signature

www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk       sales@beamends-lrspares.co.uk
             I have become... comfortably numb

John Turner - 25 Mar 2008 21:40 GMT
> If one were in need of a cheap engine and didn't mind some modding,
> this could very well be a good option.

How about a link to a picture of one of these beasts?

John.
Greg Procter - 25 Mar 2008 22:54 GMT
> > If one were in need of a cheap engine and didn't mind some modding,
> > this could very well be a good option.
>
> How about a link to a picture of one of these beasts?
>
> John.

I haven't grasped from this discussion whether the Lionel model is a
scale model, a (plastic) toy, or a tinplate train.
I'd be quite intersted in an O scale Stevenson Loco.

Regards,
Greg.P.
Andrew Robert Breen - 25 Mar 2008 23:08 GMT
>> If one were in need of a cheap engine and didn't mind some modding,
>> this could very well be a good option.
>
>How about a link to a picture of one of these beasts?

.. and one to a picture of the Lion, too. I've not  been able to find one,
and it's not for lack of looking :(

Signature

Andy Breen ~     Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
       
        "Who dies with the most toys wins" (Gary Barnes)

oldship@interalpha.couk - 25 Mar 2008 23:20 GMT
>> If one were in need of a cheap engine and didn't mind some modding,
>> this could very well be a good option.
>
>How about a link to a picture of one of these beasts?
>
>John.

Not very good but
http://www.lionel.com/Products/Catalogs/Catalog.cfm?CatalogUID=8D225DE4-B0D0-205
D-B7B009D5589290AA&PageID=1514

is how Lionel themselves present it.

G.Harman
Greg Procter - 25 Mar 2008 23:45 GMT
> >> If one were in need of a cheap engine and didn't mind some modding,
> >> this could very well be a good option.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> G.Harman

Try
<http://www.lionel.com/Products/Catalogs/Catalog.cfm?CatalogUID=8D225DE4-B0D0-205
D-B7B009D5589290AA&PageID=1516
>

There's an artist's impression and a prototype photo.

Greg.P.
Wolf K. - 26 Mar 2008 00:35 GMT
[...]
>> Not very good but
>> http://www.lionel.com/Products/Catalogs/Catalog.cfm?CatalogUID=8D225DE4-B0D0-205
D-B7B009D5589290AA&PageID=1514

[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Greg.P.

It's worth remembering "Traditional O Gauge" means something close to
1:48 scale, while "Standard O Gauge" means roughly 3/16" to the foot
scale running on O gauge tinplate track. However, Lionel tends not to
tell you the actual scale of its trains, so without seeing the model you
can't be sure. OTOH, their designers have been quite good at capturing
the look of a large engine even when built to a smaller scale so as to
run around tinplate track curves. (Designations such as O-27 refer to
the _diameter_ of the track circle in inches.)

From the meagre information in the on-line catalog, I would say that
the Shakespeare Express is close to 1:48. Because the John Bull was a
much smaller locomotive overall, it's quite possible that it's 1:48
scale, with some compromises so that it can negotiate O-27 track. But
withotu actually seeing and measuring it, you can't know.

I've noticed there are some serious factual errors in the catalog, such
as describing Kinlet Hall as running on the Great Northern Railway!

My assessment: Lionel makes excellent toy trains, but has little if
anything to offer the scale modeller.

HTH

Signature

wolf k.

Wolf K. - 26 Mar 2008 00:41 GMT
> [...]
>>> Not very good but
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> 1:48 scale, while "Standard O Gauge" means roughly 3/16" to the foot
> scale running on O gauge tinplate track.

Sorry, I got that backwards. Silly me...

[...]

Signature

wolf k.

Greg Procter - 26 Mar 2008 00:48 GMT
> > [...]
> >>> Not very good but
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> --
> wolf k.

Not to worry, I wasn't about to buy any of their products, except
perhaps that "Great Northern" Hall and the Stephenson loco.

Greg.P.
Greg Procter - 26 Mar 2008 00:48 GMT
> [...]
> >> Not very good but
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> --
> wolf k.

Hi Wolf,

can you make any sense of their G gauge offerings?
They don't seem to get any mention amongst G fans.
I did see a "Thomas" years ago before I was interested in such things
and I did seem to be reasonable (as a toy).

Regards,
Greg.P.
NZ
Wolf K. - 26 Mar 2008 02:27 GMT
[...]

> Hi Wolf,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Greg.P.
> NZ

I have a Lionel Thomas, it's a very well done toy -- robust, as close to
the Awdry dimensions as one can get based on his artwork, etc. The roofs
come off Annie and Clarabelle, which delights young children, who can
stuff teddy bears and such into the carriages. The power pack is more
than adequate. Thomas comes apart enough to service the gears and
bearings. I used Teflon-loaded grease, which has lasted better than the
original stuff. We ran Thomas regularly at the club last year when we
had a large loop of G gauge with several sidings to store the trains.
Very popular. His eyes move, too. It's standard 2-rail DC, BTW.

I'm a Thomas fan, so I would be pleased with any large scale version,
but this one is excellent IMO. My grandchildren are past the Thomas
stage, but I'm not. :-)

I have mixed feelings about Lionel. The original company made very good
toys, and a few scale items as well. Then they went broke, because they
refused to conform to NMRA standards, which meant they lost the only
market that mattered in the long run, the adults who wanted scale trains
of Lionel quality. The current owners cater mostly to the nostalgia
market, I think.

Signature

wolf k.

Christopher A. Lee - 26 Mar 2008 02:34 GMT
>[...]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>of Lionel quality. The current owners cater mostly to the nostalgia
>market, I think.

Actually they weren't that good quality. The bodies were robust toys,
but they were let down by eg cheap motors in plastic cans without any
kind of bushing for the shaft.

I don't know about the nostalgia market, but there was a resurgence
some years back. These days three rail coarse scale AC from the other
manufacturers outsells 2 rail DC by more than four to one in the USA.

It's a combination of marketing and tighter curves.
Wolf K. - 26 Mar 2008 14:20 GMT
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:27:24 -0400, "Wolf K." <wolfkir@sympatico.ca>
[...]
>> I have mixed feelings about Lionel. The original company made very good
>> toys, and a few scale items as well. Then they went broke, because they
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> but they were let down by eg cheap motors in plastic cans without any
> kind of bushing for the shaft.

Well, the Teflon grease works very well. Thomas has run several hundred
hours now, with no sign of trouble. YMMV. BTW, I lubricate all engines,
in all scales, after an initial run-in of a couple of hours or so.

> I don't know about the nostalgia market, but there was a resurgence
> some years back. These days three rail coarse scale AC from the other
> manufacturers outsells 2 rail DC by more than four to one in the USA.

True. And companies like Atlas offer both 2-rail sand 3-rail versions of
most of their scale product.

But while kids like to watch any train, Lionel and other tinplate mfrs
are marketing to the adults, not the kids (or their grandparents.) The
entry-level sets run at two to three times the price of HO sets, which
cuts out a large segment of the market. $200-300 for a toy that may not
hold interest much beyond the season is too high for most people. OTOH,
2-rail DC is definitely for the scale modeller.

There is also growing interest in On30 (O scale running on 16.5mm gauge,
representing 30" narrow gauge). This is a nice compromise for people who
want larger models but don't have the space for standard gauge O. I
suspect a lot of people who hanker after O scale have settled on On30
instead. The Christmas Village people like these trains, too, as they
need only slightly more than 3ft of width to fit an oval of On30 track
into their dioramas.

> It's a combination of marketing and tighter curves.

The tighter curves are a bonus for the adult with the usual cramped
space for a layout. My experience is that a lot of scale modellers have
fond memories of Lionel and other tinplate, but they won't buy it. A few
have an old train displayed on a shelf. The people who buy Lionel in
contrast a) don't care about scale fidelity, and care little about
prototype accuracy; b) are unabashedly reliving their childhood; and c)
aren't much interested in scale model layouts even to visit. NB that
Kalmbach has recognised this split in the market, and offers a separate
magazine for toy train enthusiasts. There is unfortunately in some
quarters hostility between the two groups, insofar as they pay attention
to each other at all.

Signature

wolf k.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.