Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / June 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

kit building ....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
simon - 16 Jun 2009 00:22 GMT
Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/OO-GAUGE-KIT-BUILT-BR-BLACK-0-6-2-COAL-TANK-LOCO-58926_W0Q
QitemZ200350027495QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Trains_Railway_Models?hash=item2ea5cacee
7&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A0
%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50


cheers,
Simon
Jim Guthrie - 16 Jun 2009 07:59 GMT
Simon,

>Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?

Looks like the K's kit of the Webb coal tank and it looks OK.  It's an
old model and they do give some warnings of its possible performance
but the chassis looks well made with the correct drivers on it.
Depends how keen you are to have a model of an LNWR prototype. :-)

Jim.
Paul - 16 Jun 2009 08:29 GMT
> Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?
>
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/OO-GAUGE-KIT-BUILT-BR-BLACK-0-6-2-COAL-TANK-LOCO-58926_W0Q
QitemZ200350027495QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Trains_Railway_Models?hash=item2ea5cacee
7&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A0
%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50

>
> cheers,
> Simon

Paint looks a bit thick in places
simon - 16 Jun 2009 21:36 GMT
>> Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Paint looks a bit thick in places
That was part of it but it was more the somewhat large gaps at joins -
especially on that review.

Cheers,
Simon
Alistair Wright - 17 Jun 2009 11:20 GMT
> Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?
>
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/OO-GAUGE-KIT-BUILT-BR-BLACK-0-6-2-COAL-TANK-LOCO-58926_W0Q
QitemZ200350027495QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Trains_Railway_Models?hash=item2ea5cacee
7&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A0
%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50

>
> cheers,
> Simon
You have to regard ebay descriptions as sometimes being equivalent to estate
agents blurbs in the days before we all got wise to them. Frankly that model
is horrible. Poorly built ( a lot of parts not square etc) and appallingly
painted. At least on ebay you do get a photo to help you make up your mind.

Prices are often wildly off the mark and this is one of those cases. Having
said that, there are real bargains to be had if you avoid bidding on items
whose termination is a Sunday night. I watch with horror as items I know are
still available (particularly kits) go for more than the RRP.

Alistair
John Turner - 17 Jun 2009 13:08 GMT
> Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?

It looks bloody awful to me, but it does depend on your understanding of the
term 'good'.

Traditionally (and this generally refers to collectable ready-to-run models)
I use the following expressions:

As new or mint - literally unused & in perfect condition

Excellent - pretty close to perfect, minimal use

Very good - still worthy of ownership but with very minor imperfections, and
having had moderate use

Good - a better expression would be 'average' - something careworn and well
used

Fair - model showing extensive use & handling, but in working order

Poor - fit for little more than spare parts

John.
simon - 17 Jun 2009 21:32 GMT
>> Is this really "built and painted to a good condition" as they describe ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> John.

thats what I would understand and in this case am disappointed as its Rails.
Know ebay descriptions are not to be taken seriously and the photos count
more but its only so if prospective purchaser accepts that. Perhaps we
should be quicker to point out that descriptions are off - constructively of
course,.
admit its quite possible that Rails are just using a standard form and were
a bit tired so let this slip through.

I'd pay £20 for it knowing would have to at least break the body and
re-assemble, remotor and re-gear (looks like an X04). If lucky
chassis/wheels may be ok although thats unlikely.
Saw a nice coal tank at a show the other week, was tempted - good price at
£90 but it wasnt the right time to splash out. May have been same kit.

Cheers,
Simon
Alistair Wright - 18 Jun 2009 10:33 GMT
> I'd pay £20 for it knowing would have to at least break the body and
> re-assemble, remotor and re-gear (looks like an X04). If lucky
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Cheers,
> Simon

I have an un-opened K's Coal Tank kit for sale. It was bought when I was
still working on my now defunct WCML layout about twenty years ago. Make me
an offer for it by p.m.. I ought to ebay it, but I can't be bothered.

Alistair
awhwwright@btinternet.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.