Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / September 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lima J50 and 94XX

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gerald H - 24 Sep 2009 14:11 GMT
The chassis on the Lima J50 and 94XX locos are pretty poor.  Has anyone
tried putting the bodies on a Hornby Jinty chassis?  Does they fit?
John Turner - 24 Sep 2009 16:13 GMT
> The chassis on the Lima J50 and 94XX locos are pretty poor.  Has anyone
> tried putting the bodies on a Hornby Jinty chassis?  Does they fit?

"Poor is gross flattery".

A mate has fitted a Bachmann 57xx chassis to the Lima 94xx, but it involved
a good deal of work, and he reckoned that the pi## poor 94xx body wasn't
worth the effort.

John.
John Nuttall - 25 Sep 2009 12:02 GMT
>> The chassis on the Lima J50 and 94XX locos are pretty poor.  Has anyone
>> tried putting the bodies on a Hornby Jinty chassis?  Does they fit?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> John.

There's nothing much wrong with the 94xx body, except the splasher
locations, and it is very easy to fit to the old Bachmann (split frame)
chassis - see http://www.gwr.org.uk/pro94xx.html. I haven't tried the later
chassis design though.

Signature

Regards

John

John Turner - 26 Sep 2009 13:18 GMT
> There's nothing much wrong with the 94xx body, except the splasher
> locations,

Sorry, I was meaning it looks cheap, nasty & plasticky.  Sure with a deal of
work it can be made into something, but out of the box the whole Lima jobbie
is/was an over-priced toy.

John.
John Nuttall - 26 Sep 2009 14:12 GMT
>> There's nothing much wrong with the 94xx body, except the splasher
>> locations,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> John.

Agreed, but worth a little bit of effort to transform.

Signature

Regards

John

Greg.Procter - 27 Sep 2009 03:25 GMT
>>> There's nothing much wrong with the 94xx body, except the splasher
>>> locations,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Agreed, but worth a little bit of effort to transform.

Such conversions can be a gentle step towards rebuilding, kit-building
and scratch-building!
If you happen to have one of each in your junk-box, why not combine them.
If the worst happens, you will have a larger collection of smaller pieces
in your junk box. At best, you will have a model which will encourage you
to get something better and a little more modelling experience :-)

Greg.P.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.