Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / November 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Copyright

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 03 Nov 2009 12:10 GMT
So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
we will all know whio he's talking about.

MBQ
simon - 03 Nov 2009 12:41 GMT
> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
> we will all know whio he's talking about.
>
> MBQ

Is there a company called "Just like the Just like the real thing" ?

Cheers,
Simon
beamends - 03 Nov 2009 13:03 GMT
> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think we
> will all know whio he's talking about.
>
> MBQ

Looking at his comments on http://www.justliketherealthing.co.uk it was
simmering for a while and blew up at Telford - though as you say, it
seems it's only those in the know who are allowed to be in know who
exactly what his problem is - which just makes it a bit amusing for this
mere mortal! I would love to know the full story though, being a nosey
bugger.

Cheers
Richard

Signature

I have become...............comfortably numb

manatbandq@hotmail.com - 03 Nov 2009 13:53 GMT
> > So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
> > months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think we
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> mere mortal! I would love to know the full story though, being a nosey
> bugger.

Indeed, but he does explicitly say that they're not copying JLTRTs
products, otherwise he would have started legal action.

He also had a go at MR for publishing an article about resin moulding
at home which involved taking a mould from one end of a wagon to
modify another.

MBQ
Christopher A. Lee - 03 Nov 2009 13:27 GMT
>So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
>months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
>we will all know whio he's talking about.

I've seen him mention this before, possibly on the JLRT web site and
wondered whom he meant.

We need to know so we can avoid buying from the wrong source.

It's not new though. Somebody copied Kemilway's excellent footbridge
way back when.

I've also seen second generation copies of Omen Miniatures castings in
the USA. They weren't quite as detailed as they should be. The dealer
claimed they were his own castings but I only know one Victorian or
Edwardian lady sitting on a trunk. To be fair he also cast American
figures and it is entirely possible he bought the moulds from somebody
else. I should stress that I also know genuine importers and dealers
who get the figures legitimately.

>MBQ
Arthur Figgis - 03 Nov 2009 19:00 GMT
>> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
>> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> We need to know so we can avoid buying from the wrong source.

Maybe the question is whether people doing that would be outnumbered by
people going to buy from the wrong source which they didn't previously
know of?

Signature

Arthur Figgis               Surrey, UK

Christopher A. Lee - 03 Nov 2009 19:36 GMT
>>> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
>>> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>people going to buy from the wrong source which they didn't previously
>know of?

Didn't think of that - just assumed people here would be as
responsible as you or me.
Greg.Procter - 03 Nov 2009 22:35 GMT
>>>> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
>>>> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Didn't think of that - just assumed people here would be as
> responsible as you or me.

Of course we are - saving 20% on any purchase is of no interest to me!
=8^O>

Greg.P.
Chris Wilson - 03 Nov 2009 21:45 GMT
"manatbandq@hotmail.com" <manatbandq@hotmail.com> wrote in news:2c93ffbc-
95d0-43a9-8abc-e09a9c6ffae0@v36g2000yqv.googlegroups.com:

> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
> we will all know whio he's talking about.

Dunno but I know how he feels, many moons ago myself and a friend produced
a range of 15mm white metal figures and models representing various 17thC
soldiers and equipment. Within 6 months direct copies were being marketed.

Ours were better but the others were 1/4 less expensive!

Signature

All the best,

Chris

John Turner - 04 Nov 2009 12:13 GMT
> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
> we will all know whio he's talking about.

I'm not sure that this is what Waterman is talking about but:

It's long been alleged that some of the major manufacturers are somewhat
cavalier in the way they use the work of others to help develop their own
models.  In particular wagon kits are known to have been used in this way,
as the finished ready-to-run model(s) have incorporated the same errors
which appear in the kits.

One of the major manufacturers was also accused of stealing a well-known
individual's photograph which subsequently appeared in their publicity
material, and they didn't seem at all concerned when that photographer
complained.

John.
Wolf K - 04 Nov 2009 14:20 GMT
>> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
>> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs? He seems to think
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> John.

If that individual could demonstrate authorship of the image he have
gone to small claims court and demanded a fair price for one-time use.
It's difficult to demonstrate authorship of railway images, as in the
very nature of things many images will look very much alike.

However:
You can invisibly watermark an image by using steganography, a technique
of hiding one file within aniother one. Captions and text inserts can be
removed from an image, a hidden watermark is much more difficult to
remove. Your assertion of copyright can be hidden in your image. A
number of commercial programs are available, as well as some free ones.
Here's a free one:

http://www.darkside.com.au/gifshuffle/

The domain name seems a bit dodgy, but WOT gives this site a green light.

Have fun!

cheers,
wolf k
Wolf K - 04 Nov 2009 14:26 GMT
Here's another freebie:

http://www.tucows.com/preview/504645

cheers,
wolf k.
roga - 04 Nov 2009 19:39 GMT
manatbandq@hotmail.com wrote in message news:
> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
> months MR editorial, copying other peoples designs?

When you say "other peoples designs" are you thinking of the people who
designed the rolling stock e.g. Gresley, Stanier,  Ridlles et al or the
people who make a living out of copying those designs at a smaller scale and
calling them models?

BTW is that the multi-millionaire Pete Waterman who at one time seemed to
make a living by sampling previous musics,e.g. "roadblock"

so lets see, copies of real engines, and copies of real music seem to be OK
to Mr Waterman, but only when he does it?

R
simon - 04 Nov 2009 22:22 GMT
> manatbandq@hotmail.com wrote in message news:
>> So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> people who make a living out of copying those designs at a smaller scale
> and calling them models?

You are daft with that suggestion. Are you aware that some modern liveries
are copywrite protected and model manufacturers have to obtain permission
before reproducing them ?

> BTW is that the multi-millionaire Pete Waterman who at one time seemed to
> make a living by sampling previous musics,e.g. "roadblock"

If he was then did anyone take him to court over these ?

> so lets see, copies of real engines, and copies of real music seem to be
> OK to Mr Waterman, but only when he does it?
>
> R
Is PW complaing about the copying of models or kit parts that go to make up
a model ?

Yes i've got a lot of time for Pete Waterman considering the work that hes
done for preservation, publicity of heritage and model railways as well as
his kit manufacturing company.

Cheers,
Simon
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 05 Nov 2009 09:06 GMT
On Nov 4, 7:39 pm, "roga" <{news2005}
> manatba...@hotmail.com wrote in message news:
> > So who is the major infringer that Pete Waterman talks about, in this
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> R

Don't be such a plonker.

Models are not "copies" of the real thing and could never be passed
off as the real thing. The liveries may be copyrighted and protected
quite fiercely in some cases.

We're talking about people who make models by copying other peoples
models. E.g. by making a mould or photographing the etch. I.E. direct
and proveable copyright infringements.

The way the real thing were built and rebuilt repeatedlt, you could
argue that some real locos were "samples" of previous designs, often
another persons designs. A boiler from here, a smokebox from there,
wheels from over there ...

MBQ
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.