Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / January 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New Heljan 33/0s

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jon Biglowe - 15 Jan 2010 12:26 GMT
Heljan have just released new 33/0 models as:
- Green D6585
- WCRC 33025
- WCRC 33029

Can anybody who has seen them please tell me if the have the 'flat' roof
profile of older 33/0s, or the corrected profile that appeared on their
33/1s. Thanks Jon
John Turner - 15 Jan 2010 14:37 GMT
> Heljan have just released new 33/0 models as:
> - Green D6585
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> profile of older 33/0s, or the corrected profile that appeared on their
> 33/1s. Thanks Jon

I've got one of the green ones in front of me now and compared with a
similar 33/1 I'd say the roof is very slightly flatter.  I'm not familar
enough with the prototypes to say whether it looks right or not.

John.
Fred X - 15 Jan 2010 15:30 GMT
> Heljan have just released new 33/0 models as:
> - Green D6585
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> profile of older 33/0s, or the corrected profile that appeared on their
> 33/1s. Thanks Jon

It's the incorrect flat roof profile. You are not one of those rivet
counters who insist on their models being the same shape as the prototype
are you? :)

Fred X
Jon Biglowe - 15 Jan 2010 16:18 GMT
> It's the incorrect flat roof profile. You are not one of those rivet
> counters who insist on their models being the same shape as the prototype
> are you? :)
>
> Fred X

It's always good if is the right shape!

It would have seemed sensible for Heljan to get it right, as they have
already done so for 33/1s. I know there are a lot of people who won't buy
these models now.

Jon
Fred X - 16 Jan 2010 16:19 GMT
>> It's the incorrect flat roof profile. You are not one of those rivet
>> counters who insist on their models being the same shape as the  
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Jon

True, but there are also those who still will.

Fred X
John Turner - 16 Jan 2010 16:47 GMT
> True, but there are also those who still will.

And have, but if you want a decent 33/0 what choices are there?

John.
Fred X - 17 Jan 2010 17:01 GMT
>> True, but there are also those who still will.
>
> And have, but if you want a decent 33/0 what choices are there?

The Hornby Railroad version? :)

Fred X
John Turner - 19 Jan 2010 14:15 GMT
> The Hornby Railroad version? :)

Enough said!  ;-)

John.
Chris - 19 Jan 2010 21:17 GMT
>> It's the incorrect flat roof profile. You are not one of those rivet
>> counters who insist on their models being the same shape as the prototype
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Jon

Contrast it with Bachmann's criticism of the 37 and the different
versions they have brought out to correct them.

Chris
Fred X - 20 Jan 2010 18:33 GMT
>>> It's the incorrect flat roof profile. You are not one of those rivet
>>> counters who insist on their models being the same shape as the  
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Contrast it with Bachmann's criticism of the 37 and the different  
> versions they have brought out to correct them.

Yes, but there are much larger sales potential for a Class 37.

Fred X
Chris - 20 Jan 2010 22:39 GMT
>>>> It's the incorrect flat roof profile. You are not one of those rivet
>>>> counters who insist on their models being the same shape as the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Fred X
They never corrected the 47 either which has at least the same sales
potential as a 37.

Chris
John Turner - 22 Jan 2010 13:00 GMT
> They never corrected the 47 either which has at least the same sales
> potential as a 37.

Oh really?

You've not seen the latest class 47s from Bachmann then?

John.
Chris - 22 Jan 2010 18:16 GMT
>> They never corrected the 47 either which has at least the same sales
>> potential as a 37.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> John.

Not quite sure what you mean. I was making the point that Bachmann do
seem to try and correct mistakes even if not wholly successful whereas
Heljan don't seem to revisit their products.

Chris
John Turner - 23 Jan 2010 09:25 GMT
> Not quite sure what you mean.

You said they've never corrected the class 47 - but it may be that you were
referring to the Heljan model and not the Bachmann one as I first assmed.
If that's the case then I apologise unreservedly.

Just to clarify my comment: Bachmann have modified their class 47 tooling
and the latest models seem to be a worthwhile improvement over the earlier
ones.

John.
Riddles - 23 Jan 2010 18:25 GMT
From: "John Turner" <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:25 AM
Newsgroups: uk.rec.models.rail
Subject: Re: New Heljan 33/0s

> Just to clarify my comment: Bachmann have modified their class 47 tooling
> and the latest models seem to be a worthwhile improvement over the earlier
> ones.
>
> John.

Do they still have rivet heads around the windscreen frames, like the class
57?

Riddles
John Turner - 23 Jan 2010 19:08 GMT
> Do they still have rivet heads around the windscreen frames, like the
> class 57?

No, they've been removed along with the piping from the (class 57) bogies.

John.
Riddles - 23 Jan 2010 23:03 GMT
>> Do they still have rivet heads around the windscreen frames, like the
>> class 57?
>
> No, they've been removed along with the piping from the (class 57) bogies.
>
> John.

Presumably this has happened in the last 12 months then!

My 32-801DS, (D1746) bought on 26/1/09 has similar windscreen surrounds and
bogies, to my 32-760 (57307) bought 25/8/06.

Riddles
John Turner - 24 Jan 2010 12:16 GMT
> My 32-801DS, (D1746) bought on 26/1/09 has similar windscreen surrounds
> and bogies, to my 32-760 (57307) bought 25/8/06.

Yes, the first modified release (late 2009) was in the new boxing (with
internal clear plastic model support) and from memory is:

31-652 - 47474 "Sir Roland Hill" in RES livery

31-650 & 31-651 are due to follow soon

John.
Chris - 23 Jan 2010 18:28 GMT
>> Not quite sure what you mean.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> John.

Yep that's what I meant following the Heljan 33/0 retooling discussion
and yes I know Bachmann have brought out a newer version of the 47.
Sorry for the confusion.

Chris
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.