Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / March 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Nottingham East Mids MRE

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
simon - 21 Mar 2010 22:50 GMT
A dream venue of quality traders - well my choice anyway. Such a friendly
bunch that were a pleasure to meet - mostly for the first time. Included
Branchlines, Comet, Judith Edge kits, Mercian kits, SE Finecast - all happy
to give advice or just chat. Thats not the complete list just the main ones.
An excellent opportunity to see greater selection of their products as well
as comment on stuff previously purchased.

Two interesting finds from Branchlines - Pack of 5 grubscrews that fit their
gears (bought 2) and Kean Maygib Frame alignment jig. Has anyone used this
jig by any chance ?

cheers,
Simon
Keith Patrick - 22 Mar 2010 08:19 GMT
I agree that it was a good show, but felt the catering was a bit basic
Trev - 22 Mar 2010 19:56 GMT
> I agree that it was a good show, but felt the catering was a bit basic

There are some good pub meals to be had in town.
Paul Boyd - 22 Mar 2010 18:44 GMT
Oh b***er!!!  I meant to go to that show, but worrying about and fixing
my sick car meant I forgot all about it.

Oh well.  After fixing the car I couldn't afford to go anyway :-(

Signature

Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.me.uk/

simon - 22 Mar 2010 21:56 GMT
> Oh b***er!!!  I meant to go to that show, but worrying about and fixing my
> sick car meant I forgot all about it.
>
> Oh well.  After fixing the car I couldn't afford to go anyway :-(

Forgot - you must have a most hectic life :-) However if not taking piles of
cash, with those traders its best not to go !

Cheers,
Simon
Dragon Heart - 23 Mar 2010 15:49 GMT
We were going to go but were all sick :-(

Simon    Did you see 'uncle' Pete ?
simon - 23 Mar 2010 17:28 GMT
> We were going to go but were all sick :-(
>
> Simon    Did you see 'uncle' Pete ?

Unfortunately no, he was there on Saturday to open it. To be honest, I
woudnt rate it as one of the better family shows. Nothing specific and there
were some child friendly people about.

Cheers,
Simon
Dragon Heart - 25 Mar 2010 01:37 GMT
> > We were going to go but were all sick :-(
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> woudnt rate it as one of the better family shows. Nothing specific and there
> were some child friendly people about.

Talking of 'family shows' I note Mickleover Model Railway Group 2010
exhibition is now at the Moorways Sports Centre, Derby.

Have we missed the Buxton show for this year ?
simon - 25 Mar 2010 12:11 GMT
On 23 Mar, 16:28, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Dragon Heart" <chris.bret...@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Talking of 'family shows' I note Mickleover Model Railway Group 2010
>exhibition is now at the Moorways Sports Centre, Derby.

>Have we missed the Buxton show for this year ?

Dont know as its not one in our range - impatient passenger. The next good
family one is Soar Valley at Swannington - April 3/4.

Saw that someone made comment about one of Nottingham's layouts being scarce
of running trains. Was nicely put, very gentle. was immediately slapped down
as inappropriate to critisize by a few other posters then moderator told him
off for spoiling the thread. Even had I not agreed with the comment would
certainly welcome the debate, how else can we learn.
Whats the definition of a forum ?

Cheers,
Simon
Dragon Heart - 26 Mar 2010 00:43 GMT
> On 23 Mar, 16:28, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Cheers,
> Simon

The layout with the most bodies around it at Buxton last year was one
which had plenty of action. Bus’s going round a town square, dockyard
engines with lifting bridge even a balloon which takes off plus the
‘real’ layout. They had plenty of static action with amusing figures
etc.

The children go to see moving loco’s.

Perhaps the moderator had an ‘interest’ in the show / layout ?

As long as you are not rude about it why should you not say what you
think ?
simon - 26 Mar 2010 13:22 GMT
On 25 Mar, 11:11, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Dragon Heart" <chris.bret...@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> Cheers,
> Simon

The layout with the most bodies around it at Buxton last year was one
which had plenty of action. Bus’s going round a town square, dockyard
engines with lifting bridge even a balloon which takes off plus the
‘real’ layout. They had plenty of static action with amusing figures
etc.

The children go to see moving loco’s.

Perhaps the moderator had an ‘interest’ in the show / layout ?

As long as you are not rude about it why should you not say what you
think ?
==============================================

Too often we immediatetly try to fight back and prove other person wrong :-)
Instead the exhibitor should do a bit of checking and see if it was just a
one off, difference of opinion or if they could make the layout more
interesting - if they want to.
Not sure if I spent much time looking at this layout but when did wander
round there were a few with little action. Only felt welcome at one or 2
layouts, at the others it was as if they were reading a newspaper and I was
looking over their shoulder:-)

Cheers,
Simon
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 26 Mar 2010 11:00 GMT
> On 23 Mar, 16:28, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> certainly welcome the debate, how else can we learn.
> Whats the definition of a forum ?

Private fiefdom when it's run like that.

MBQ
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.