It's out and the photos look great.....
Rob.
> It's out and the photos look great.....
>
> Rob.
Is just me, or does the pantograph look a bit dodgy?
ROB
sutartsorric - 27 Mar 2010 15:37 GMT
> > It's out and the photos look great.....
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> ROB
Isn't that because they have extended the pantograph way beyond its
working position just for the photographs?
Rob Wilson - 27 Mar 2010 16:11 GMT
>> It's out and the photos look great.....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> ROB
That did cross my mind too but I think that's a minor point.
Rob.
Christopher A. Lee - 27 Mar 2010 16:34 GMT
>>> It's out and the photos look great.....
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Rob.
What do you get if you drop a grand piano down a pitshaft?
A flat miner.
John Turner - 27 Mar 2010 17:47 GMT
> Is just me, or does the pantograph look a bit dodgy?
It doesn't seem possible (on the three I've tried) to get the pantograph to
lay down in the retracted position on the top of the loco roof.
John.
pete_the_trainman@yahoo.co.uk - 27 Mar 2010 21:06 GMT
Push back gently at the rear and press down the front as you do so and
it will clip in. Careful you don't damage the radio aerials as you
repack them.
Regards.
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:47:50 -0000, "John Turner" <nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:
>> Is just me, or does the pantograph look a bit dodgy?
>
>It doesn't seem possible (on the three I've tried) to get the pantograph to
>lay down in the retracted position on the top of the loco roof.
>
>John.