> On 17 May, 13:55, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> If it was a curious explanation then that might have been him :-)
The guy asking the question was, I think, attempting to trip him up on
the track layout but the explanation and the visual display soon
sorted him out. The trouble is children of that age tend to take
questions at face value. His explanation was more long than
curious :-)
simon - 18 May 2010 21:40 GMT
On 18 May, 10:15, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Dragon Heart" <chris.bret...@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> If it was a curious explanation then that might have been him :-)
The guy asking the question was, I think, attempting to trip him up on
the track layout but the explanation and the visual display soon
sorted him out. The trouble is children of that age tend to take
questions at face value. His explanation was more long than
curious :-)
He did well then as he hadnt seen the layout before we arrived at lunchtime,
first time he has talked himself onto an '0' guage !
Cheers,
Simon