> Nice little earner, given what you need to make one.
That's actually a reasonable price, given what you need to make one ;-)
...and pay people's wages, and pay for development and regulatory
approval, and electricity bills, and corporation tax, and building
rental/mortgage, then the reseller has to pay people's wages and on and
on and on..
My last job was in sub-contract manufacture, and a general rule of thumb
was that the materials cost around 60% of the sale price depending on
the type of product. That's not retail, that's from the manufacturer to
the retailer, who also has to make some money after paying his
overheads. And would you like to pay to import one of those from the
USA at that weight?
And you should never start a sentence with the word "and" :-)

Signature
Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.me.uk/
simon - 24 Jun 2010 18:27 GMT
>> Nice little earner, given what you need to make one.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> And you should never start a sentence with the word "and" :-)
and you should never generalise
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 25 Jun 2010 10:23 GMT
> On 24/06/2010 13:54, manatba...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> overheads. And would you like to pay to import one of those from the
> USA at that weight?
A good rule of thumb for the model railway market (i.e. not mobile
phone type mega volumes) is retail price of about 4x to 5x component
cost.
I think it's overprices by at least 50% compared to something that
could do the same job.
I'm referring to manufacturing in the UK, importing a heavy itenm does
add cost. The OP referred to London Road Models supplying again at
£150 which implies I'm actually being kind.
MBQ