Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / May 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The DCC Sagas

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sailor - 21 May 2010 16:11 GMT
The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.

The lead car took 30 mins to provide a good working unit. Then the
trouble started!

My reasoning said that the wiring would be identical and it would
suffice to simply reverse the normal direction anf things should be
good.

On the test track this proved to be the case but transfer to the
running track usually showed that the simple act of picking up the
loco caused the direction command to flip.

Equally, switching off the lights prior to this movement means that
they are off - period.

One of the decoders ended up refusing to drive anything although still
programable.

There must be a switch sequence which Bachmann decoders obey to
disable lights (apart from the rather obvious on/off control and the
function 0 select).   It must be related to the "go to address 03
command"!

And yes I have verified the wiring etc and run the system using other
decoders!   Is there a hidden secret known only to the trade in which
Bachmann 36-553 decoders misbehave so and why are they suddenly so
scarce?
Sailor - 22 May 2010 13:40 GMT
> The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
> HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Bachmann 36-553 decoders misbehave so and why are they suddenly so
> scarce?

Well not being one to give up easily I have persevered.  Reading all
the cv's of the "failed" decoders I found the only  changed one to be
29. This sets the direction and also enables dc + dcc.    By choosing
reverse and dcc only the cv set to 0 (normally 6) and would not reset
by selecting normal (default) direction and dc + dcc.

Susequently by resetting the decoder (cv8 set to value 8) and having
reset the Elite the decoders were normalised and obeyed the function
commands.

To make the unit run I have been obliged to reverse the motor wiring
and exchange the ahead and astern connections of the trailing power
unit.

My conclusion is that the reverse direction command does not work as
cleanly as might be expected when two units are in a consist or
sharing the cv1 operator number.  This is rather like the Select Unit
losing control of acc & decell when in walkabout mode.
Jane Sullivan - 22 May 2010 22:03 GMT
> The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
> HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Bachmann 36-553 decoders misbehave so and why are they suddenly so
> scarce?

I don't use Bachmann or Hornby decoders. I'm not saying there's anything
wrong with them; it's just that I've had no problems with Lenz and TCS
decoders, and I'm sticking with them in spite of (or even because of)
their higher prices.

Signature

Jane
OO/HO and DCC in the garden
http://www.janesullivan.webspace.virginmedia.com/railway/railway.html

Chris - 23 May 2010 15:57 GMT
> The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
> HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Bachmann 36-553 decoders misbehave so and why are they suddenly so
> scarce?
Never had any problems with early Lenz decoders in two power cars. Just
to note that they have different addresses and when using together I
make sure they going in the same direction before Muing them. This is
don on a Digitrax system.
Signature

Chris

Sailor - 24 May 2010 10:21 GMT
> > The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
> > HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

I must admit that my experiments have revealed two very different
results for pseudo  similar applications.   It is absolutely the case
that in order to either consist or share an address that each and
every cv must be set to the same values.    In a "consist" using a
third party address the functions appear to be inhibited in the state
pre consisting.   If using a common address (as for the HST ) all
functions are available.

This is an important fact in my view as I have managed to damage two
decoders during this exercise.

What I cannot know is the result using other than Hornby controllers
with Bachmann chips.

Certainly the consist case explained why it sometimes took 5 or 6
tries to form up with both locos accepting command  --  the only
stipulation from Hornby being to ensure both units are set to a common
direction and have similar performance characteristics.
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 24 May 2010 13:48 GMT
> > > The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
> > > HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> that in order to either consist or share an address that each and
> every cv must be set to the same values.

There may be some restriction in the low end systems you are using but
that's absolutely not the general case for DCC.

Does your command station implement consisting in the command station
or do you use advanced consisting in the decoder by setting the
consist address CV?

Simply setting two decoders to the same address is not consisting DCC
terms. It has a very specific meaning depending on the answer to the
previous question.

>>   In a "consist" using a
> third party address the functions appear to be inhibited in the state
> pre consisting.  

What's a "third party address"?

MBQ
Chris - 24 May 2010 19:11 GMT
>>> The latest exercise has been to fit decoders and LED lamps to my
>>> HST125 which has two power carsof almost identical performance.
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> stipulation from Hornby being to ensure both units are set to a common
> direction and have similar performance characteristics.
The Hornby advice is very sound. It is best to make sure they are
driving the same way then drive one to other in desired direction to
couple then MU the two locos together. Don't know about the nuances of
Elite unit perhaps Simon who comes on the group can help you as it very
much depends if the MUing is done on the decoders or the command
station. I use the command station version on my Digitrax command station.

Signature

Chris

Sailor - 25 May 2010 12:08 GMT
> > On 23 mai, 16:57, Chris<nos...@nospam.com>  wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> --
> Chris

To answer Chris & MBQ  : the consist takes place in the Elite (or
Select). I am sure of this because on the odd occasion a loco ( of the
pair consisted) does not disengage when commanded. This is overcome by
resetting the controller.  When I set up the HST or indeed if I were
to use any other similar arrangement to replicate Heading & Tailing
then I would set both units to the same address as it is after all a
reasonably permenent arrangement.
When I refer to a third party address it merely reflects the fact that
Hornby use higher address numbers for double headed consists and
neither original address is used. To me, that makes the operational
address to be 3rd party.

One of my early errors was to pair up similar locos fitted with
different make decoders.   A Bachmann produces totally differing
results from the newer Hornby decoders when fitted in the same loco.
simon - 25 May 2010 13:14 GMT
On May 24, 8:11 pm, Chris <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On 24/05/2010 10:21, Sailor wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> --
> Chris

To answer Chris & MBQ  : the consist takes place in the Elite (or
Select). I am sure of this because on the odd occasion a loco ( of the
pair consisted) does not disengage when commanded. This is overcome by
resetting the controller.  When I set up the HST or indeed if I were
to use any other similar arrangement to replicate Heading & Tailing
then I would set both units to the same address as it is after all a
reasonably permenent arrangement.
When I refer to a third party address it merely reflects the fact that
Hornby use higher address numbers for double headed consists and
neither original address is used. To me, that makes the operational
address to be 3rd party.

One of my early errors was to pair up similar locos fitted with
different make decoders.   A Bachmann produces totally differing
results from the newer Hornby decoders when fitted in the same loco.
=========================================================

Not so sure if consisting done within Elite rather than the decoder, if you
look at manual it says must be in range 0-99, thats the same limitation as
put on by consist address of NMRA -
CV 19 Consist Address (2 digit)  1-99.
Then there are a series of Consist specific CV's such as :-
CV 21 Consist Address Active for Functions 1 to Functions 8 - Sets whether
Functions 1 to Functions 8 respond to commands at Consist Address in
addition to the locomotive address.

Have you tried playing with any of these ?
Also if it was done in the Elite then wouldnt need loco on track - have you
tried setting a consist without loco. Could also try setup with loco on
address 3 as one of consist, then put a different loco with address 3.

Cheers,
Simon
These would be required if you want to set one loco with headlights and one
with taillights.
Sailor - 25 May 2010 19:22 GMT
> On May 24, 8:11 pm, Chris <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

Hi Simon,

I based my surmise on the fact that neither of the loco addresses will
respond individually when control is transferred to a consist address
and functions are not controllable in this mode.      The fact that
blocks can occur on ex consist addresses also indicates to me that the
control is indeed set into the controller. These are the times when I
have needed to reset the Elite to clear the glitch. I have
accidentally made up a double head when both loco were off the track
but only one of them played!  I have yet to succeed in a DH first
time.    CV21 does not play any part in my limited need for functions
at present.

The basic question is always there -- How do the 7 y.o. + fans
manage ?    Or, is there always someone to hand unlike the early days
of OO in my own 1940s experience?
simon - 25 May 2010 21:42 GMT
On 25 mai, 14:14, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Sailor" <apeterabra...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

Hi Simon,

I based my surmise on the fact that neither of the loco addresses will
respond individually when control is transferred to a consist address
and functions are not controllable in this mode.      The fact that
blocks can occur on ex consist addresses also indicates to me that the
control is indeed set into the controller. These are the times when I
have needed to reset the Elite to clear the glitch. I have
accidentally made up a double head when both loco were off the track
but only one of them played!  I have yet to succeed in a DH first
time.    CV21 does not play any part in my limited need for functions
at present.

The basic question is always there -- How do the 7 y.o. + fans
manage ?    Or, is there always someone to hand unlike the early days
of OO in my own 1940s experience?
==============================================

Think its more likely a co-operative setup where the decoder has the consist
address as well as its primary address an information as to what functions
to allow when in a consist. Then the controller knows that theres a consist
in operation so will not forward requests to the primary address. Decoders
may accept commands for either address.
So when you reset the Elite it doesnt tell the decoders to end the consist,
they dont care. The other pointer is the difficulty you are having in
setting a consist. if it was controller only then would expect would work
first time every time.

As a matter of interest, are your locos on the main for setup and did you
need a special unit to cope with dodgy French power supply or is it the same
as UK ?

Cheers,
Simon
Sailor - 26 May 2010 12:05 GMT
> On 25 mai, 14:14, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 110 lines]
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

When playing with CVs I always stay on the set up track and switch off
the main.   Setting DH etc is done on the Main through the "Operate"
prog route. Our power is the same as yours  -- a great deal of yours
comes from the French Nuclear Plants.  The sole difference is the use
of standard Euro Skts/plugs (another UK opt out).

I air these issues here because my comms with Hornby and Bachmann
whilst harmonious rarely get an answer to the question asked  -- just
like our own dear politico friends!     At the moment I am unable to
buy Bachmann 553s as no one has stock and no one knows the root
cause.   Until I get to properly understand the tricks of the trade I
am reluctant to  spend heavy money on control systems or decoders;  We
are still suffering from the 30% + loss in income inflicted by the
antics of our last dear pm (and I pay UK tax)  so these things fall
into the luxury class at present.

Peter
manatbandq@hotmail.com - 26 May 2010 13:41 GMT
> Our power is the same as yours  -- a great deal of yours
> comes from the French Nuclear Plants.  

And vice-versa (but not so much nuclear) when they reverse the current
flow in the cross channel interconnect. One reason why changing the UK
to the same time zone as Europe (i.e. double summer time), thus
aligning the peak periods for power consumption, is a stupid idea.

MBQ
damduck-egg@yahoo.co.uk - 26 May 2010 17:45 GMT
>When playing with CVs I always stay on the set up track and switch off
>the main.   Setting DH etc is done on the Main through the "Operate"
>prog route. Our power is the same as yours  -- a great deal of yours
>comes from the French Nuclear Plants.  The sole difference is the use
>of standard Euro Skts/plugs (another UK opt out).

I doubt if you really mean Euroskts and plugs which are two pin
ungrounded things.
France tends to use a socket which is very close to the German
originated Schuko . Its close enough that some plugs have been
designed that will fit both .Between the two and the plugs that fit
both it does seem the most prevelant in Europe but they are not
Europlugs.
A perusal of this site will show that even within Europe there are
still many variations.
http://users.telenet.be/worldstandards/electricity.htm#plugs

G.Harman
Sailor - 27 May 2010 08:04 GMT
On 26 mai, 18:45, damduck-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 04:05:44 -0700 (PDT), Sailor
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> G.Harman

Having lived here for 20 years and travelled from south Iberia to
north Estonia and over into Hungary I have yet to find myself unable
to plug in!  The sole place where I needed an adaptor was in
Switzerland but that was a one off. No modern connections of 16A
rating are unearthed and all modern domestic distribution systems use
line & neutral  leakage trips. This has the effect of making a safe
system no matter how the wires are fitted.   This was the original
system developed by SWEB as many parts of Bristol which had been DC
until WWII wrecked the Corporation generating station. There were no
earths and fitting them was a huge task and beyond the pocket of most
people in 1950!  I use the term Euro plug as it has common features
and I know of no other correct name for them.  My 50 years in the
proffession often caused me to despair at the antics of the I.E.E. and
their often irrational changes to regulations.
damduck-egg@yahoo.co.uk - 27 May 2010 19:36 GMT
>On 26 mai, 18:45, damduck-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 May 2010 04:05:44 -0700 (PDT), Sailor
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>system developed by SWEB as many parts of Bristol which had been DC
>until WWII wrecked the Corporation generating station.

If you are an admirer of SWEB who  got on with the job of electrifying
a very large rural area in a reasonable time scale in the 50's and
60's  (our mains arrived in 64. The Lister Starto Matic along with
many neigbouring gennys was bought by a dealer and sent to Brazil)
then you will find this site interesting.
http://www.swehs.co.uk/

Apology's if you know about them already.

G.Harman
Sailor - 27 May 2010 20:06 GMT
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:04:45 -0700 (PDT), Sailor
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

Thank you for this site!   I lived very close to Beaconsfield Rd as a
boy and Counterslip was also part of my youth.  I am also a fan of
lister Generators having bought several in my Engineering role  --  I
was responsible for a DC powered ship which was built that way some 20
years after the marine world had gone over to AC but at least it was
total computer controlled and logged.
simon - 26 May 2010 20:58 GMT
On 25 mai, 22:42, "simon" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Sailor" <apeterabra...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 126 lines]
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

When playing with CVs I always stay on the set up track and switch off
the main.   Setting DH etc is done on the Main through the "Operate"
prog route. Our power is the same as yours  -- a great deal of yours
comes from the French Nuclear Plants.  The sole difference is the use
of standard Euro Skts/plugs (another UK opt out).

I air these issues here because my comms with Hornby and Bachmann
whilst harmonious rarely get an answer to the question asked  -- just
like our own dear politico friends!     At the moment I am unable to
buy Bachmann 553s as no one has stock and no one knows the root
cause.   Until I get to properly understand the tricks of the trade I
am reluctant to  spend heavy money on control systems or decoders;  We
are still suffering from the 30% + loss in income inflicted by the
antics of our last dear pm (and I pay UK tax)  so these things fall
into the luxury class at present.

Peter

================================================
I'm in a similar financial situation till get a job ;-)

Am very tempted to get a couple of locos out and try this myself !
However, seems to me your first problem is that controller/decoders are
taking so much effort to set up in a consist. Best to start with a known
configuration, what decoders are you using and which controller ?

Cheers,
Simon
Chris - 27 May 2010 17:54 GMT
> On May 24, 8:11 pm, Chris <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On 24/05/2010 10:21, Sailor wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> These would be required if you want to set one loco with headlights and
> one with taillights.

Seems complicated compared to Digitrax where you dial up both locos then
then press the MU+ button to add a loco 2 to loco 1 and if you want more
dial up loco 3 then select loco 1 and press the MU+ button. Use the MU-
button to remove loco's. I think they call it universal consisting as it
does not require the decoder to do anything as the command station does
all the signalling to the decoders involved in the consist.

Signature

Chris

simon - 27 May 2010 18:10 GMT
>> On May 24, 8:11 pm, Chris <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> On 24/05/2010 10:21, Sailor wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
> does not require the decoder to do anything as the command station does
> all the signalling to the decoders involved in the consist.

No I think its about the same.

Cheers,
Simon
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.