>Are they really that bad? I bought a hornby Flying Scotsman (about £50
>version) and I can't send it backwards over points at any great speed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>of wheels near the rear of the loco that don't "hug" the track (They
>don't have rims) - they move around too much.
Yes they are but the tender drive A3 is also That Bad. Mine is now
retired to static in the shed. There are several problems, most
especially the tendency of the tender to crab under power. That,
combined with the wheels and points being designed to interoperate
with Tri-Ang, makes derailments very common.
>Is Peco the way to go with points?
IMO yes but it won't fix the problem entirely. I have bought an HO
wheel spacing gauge and adjusted the back-to-back every axle on the
layout, plus added a .010" shim to each check rail, and that has
resulted in dramatic improvements in reliability of working over
points. I think I had tried most things before that, especially adding
weight, but that was what made the real difference. It is a long and
tedious job (I have over 100 sets of points on my layout and something
close to 200 axles).
Guy

Signature
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/
The usenet price promise: all opinions offered in newsgroups are guaranteed
to be worth the price paid.
Chris Wilson - 19 Jun 2010 19:31 GMT
> layout, plus added a .010" shim to each check rail, and that has
> resulted in dramatic improvements in reliability
You don't have a photo of that you can share do you?

Signature
All the best,
Chris
simon - 19 Jun 2010 21:54 GMT
>>Are they really that bad? I bought a hornby Flying Scotsman (about £50
>>version) and I can't send it backwards over points at any great speed
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Guy
Yes they are bad but more a case of they wear quickly or sloppy closing
rather than inacurate from start. Peco much better.
But much more likely is the back to back, get yourself a guage as Guy says
(HO and OO are the same for track). As a temporary measure get a wagon that
goes through points ok (both forward and back), use that as a guide. Also
check the traction tyres are still in place on the tender, some do seem to
get thrown rather easily.
With all due respect to Guy, must mention that few people need shims on Peco
points.
Cheers,
Simon
Wolf K - 20 Jun 2010 00:31 GMT
[...]
> With all due respect to Guy, must mention that few people need shims on
> Peco points.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
Needed with "universal" turnouts, whose check gauge is way off for NMRA
wheels sets. That's because universal turnouts are designed to pass
those over-thick Hornby flanges.
cheers,
wolf k.
Fred Bear - 20 Jun 2010 07:36 GMT
> Yes they are but the tender drive A3 is also That Bad. Mine is now
> retired to static in the shed. There are several problems, most
> especially the tendency of the tender to crab under power.
I had a similar problem with a new 'City of Nottingham'. Solved the problem
by removing the pickups from the tender after much fiddling around which
improved the prblem but not by much. Never found having less pickups to be
a problem.
> Are they really that bad? I bought a hornby Flying Scotsman (about £50
> version) and I can't send it backwards over points at any great speed
> (even if the points are straight).
Why would you want to? Reversing an express loco would usually only be done
at relatively slow speeds. Why would you expect a model to cope with
something that the real thing wouldn't be expected to cope with?
John.
Craig Coope - 22 Jun 2010 23:23 GMT
>> Are they really that bad? I bought a hornby Flying Scotsman (about £50
>> version) and I can't send it backwards over points at any great speed
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>John.
I don't want to but on some of the points the loco will switch the
points no matter what speed I run it through.
--
The Zero ST