> I am going stir crazy and need a hobby.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Eric

Signature
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the
Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy
| One thing to remember when you model this. While the size of the
| model is different from the original the molecules that interact
| with the lifting surfaces are STILL the same.
Even so, aerodynamics (and yes, the _same_ rules do apply to things in
the water too) are reasonably well understood. His airfoil
(hydrofoil?) will have a different Reynolds number, but the
differences that this creates should be fairly well understood.
As for the earlier post where it says that the original poster knows
>0< about R/C ... might I suggest learning a bit about R/C first?
Make a simpler boat first, You (the original poster) might also want
to try a plane or two as well, since you're dealing with a lot of
aerodynamics here. (But know that you can't legally use the same
transmitters and receivers for both plane and boat unless they're on
the 27 or 50 mHz bands.)
It's a great hobby, and it sounds like you might have a great time
with it, and it might have a great time with you. I'd hate to see you
get frustrated with it because your first project is a bit overly
ambitious. Get your feet wet with something simpler.
| When someone finally figures out how to either scale them down
| things will get interesting.
Don't they just have to go into a quantum singularity and then come
back out without retracting their exact path? At least that's what I
recall seeing on Deep Space 9 -- though I'm suprised that they didn't
have to reconfigure the deflector dish to emit a beam of positively
charged chronoton particles into a static warp bubble too ...

Signature
Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
"We are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur." --Quayle
Keith Schiffner - 23 Feb 2005 01:47 GMT
"Doug McLaren"
SNIP
What he said... or simple yep that sounds right to
me. I use my thumb to measure entirely too much.
> Don't they just have to go into a quantum
> singularity and then come
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> charged chronoton particles into a static warp
> bubble too ...
Oh sure do it the HARD way! As for me I merely
take an improbability computer give a nice warm
cuppa' and wait for the results. 8^)

Signature
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the
Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy
abracadabra - 24 Feb 2005 18:47 GMT
> You (the original poster) might also want
> to try a plane or two as well, since you're dealing with a lot of
> aerodynamics here. (But know that you can't legally use the same
> transmitters and receivers for both plane and boat unless they're on
> the 27 or 50 mHz bands.)
Excellent insight! Thank you,
Eric
abracadabra - 24 Feb 2005 19:02 GMT
> As for the earlier post where it says that the original poster knows
> >0< about R/C ... might I suggest learning a bit about R/C first?
> Make a simpler boat first,
...<SNIP>...
> It's a great hobby, and it sounds like you might have a great time
> with it, and it might have a great time with you. I'd hate to see you
> get frustrated with it because your first project is a bit overly
> ambitious. Get your feet wet with something simpler.
I have been trying to pick a deep V hull pre-built, ready-to-use model
as my first entry into this.
I viewed this as the test-bed that might be retro-fitted with test foils for
exploration/confirmation of static/dynamic analysis.
Are there any brands that hobbyist/amateurs (aficionados of sport)
find
- fragile
- temperamental
- frustrating
in other words, brands to avoid ?
Could you qualify your comments for each of the following categories ?
[1] boat brands
Thank you,
Eric
abracadabra - 24 Feb 2005 19:02 GMT
> As for the earlier post where it says that the original poster knows
> It's a great hobby, and it sounds like you might have a great time
> with it, and it might have a great time with you. I'd hate to see you
> get frustrated with it because your first project is a bit overly
> ambitious. Get your feet wet with something simpler.
Are there any brands that hobbyist/amateurs (aficionados of sport)
find
- fragile
- temperamental
- frustrating
in other words, brands to avoid ?
Could you qualify your comments for each of the following categories ?
[1] RC control brands
[2] RC servos
[3] electric motors
[4] battery/charger systems
Thank you,
Eric
Doug McLaren - 25 Feb 2005 16:49 GMT
| > As for the earlier post where it says that the original poster knows
| > It's a great hobby, and it sounds like you might have a great time
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
| - frustrating
| in other words, brands to avoid ?
As for radio equipment goes, all of the big manufacturers make good
stuff -- Futaba, JR, Hitec, Airtronics. Hitec is a tad cheaper, but
the quality is similar all around.
As for motors, I don't really do boats -- I do planes -- so what you'd
use may be different than my experience.
But with planes, motors, even the good ones, don't cost too much
compared to the rest of your eqipment. It's the speed controls and
batteries that really suck up your money. Brushed motors wear out (on
the better ones, you can replace the brushes), brushless motors seem
to last forever, are more efficient and cost more.
For chargers, I don't know what your needs are, but I'm very fond of
my GP Triton charger. It's not the best, but it does everything, and
the performance/price ratio is possibly the highest out there. It'll
probably do whatever you need it to do, but if you have really large
batteries or lots of them, it might not do it as fast as you'd prefer.
| Could you qualify your comments for each of the following categories ?
| [1] RC control brands
| [2] RC servos
| [3] electric motors
| [4] battery/charger systems

Signature
Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
Trying is the first step toward failure. - Homer Simpson
abracadabra - 24 Feb 2005 19:29 GMT
> Don't they just have to go into a quantum singularity and then come
> back out without retracting their exact path? At least that's what I
> recall seeing on Deep Space 9 -- though I'm surprised that they didn't
> have to reconfigure the deflector dish to emit a beam of positively
> charged chronoton particles into a static warp bubble too ...
Sounds like you're using the deflector dish to deflect our attention
towards your other passion, Trekker Brotherhood !
Eric