Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Water Models / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Frequency?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rob Mills - 10 Jul 2005 05:38 GMT
I'm new to RC and would like to know what two channel radio system/frequency
gives the best distance/control, AM or FM ? I'm planning on using them on a
small lake that is maybe a city block across and two city blocks long. I'm
thinking electric but don't rule out combustion type power. RM ~
Funfly3 - 10 Jul 2005 14:36 GMT
depends which country you are in??? at a Guess your in the states??
> I'm new to RC and would like to know what two channel radio
> system/frequency gives the best distance/control, AM or FM ? I'm planning
> on using them on a small lake that is maybe a city block across and two
> city blocks long. I'm thinking electric but don't rule out combustion type
> power. RM ~
Rob Mills - 10 Jul 2005 16:27 GMT
>>>> depends which country you are in??? at a Guess your in the states??<<<<

Yes, I'm in the states. RM ~
Funfly3 - 10 Jul 2005 21:20 GMT
over here in the UK AM or FM seems to make little difference both have a
greater range than a my eyesight

>>>>> depends which country you are in??? at a Guess your in the
>>>>> states??<<<<
>
> Yes, I'm in the states. RM ~
Rob Mills - 11 Jul 2005 01:13 GMT
>>>  both have a greater range than a my eyesight <<<

Thanks, I wonder if the frequency makes any difference in range or
reliability? I think we have the option of 27 or 75 MHz here. RM ~

PS, Does this newsgroup have a companion binary group?
John Mianowski - 11 Jul 2005 03:56 GMT
>I'm new to RC and would like to know what two channel radio system/frequency
>gives the best distance/control, AM or FM ? I'm planning on using them on a
>small lake that is maybe a city block across and two city blocks long. I'm
>thinking electric but don't rule out combustion type power. RM ~

Either AM or FM can operate on the same frequency.  Both are generally
equivalent in terms of distance.  However, FM is more able to reject
interference.  AM (Amplitude Modulation) receivers can be overwhelmed
by a stronger transmission source than your transmitter.  This can be
something like a commercial radio, police, fire, etc.  FM (Frequency
Modulation) is not as susceptible.  AM radios are generally cheaper &
have limited features.

JM
Rob Mills - 11 Jul 2005 06:27 GMT
>>>AM (Amplitude Modulation) receivers can be overwhelmed by a stronger
>>>transmission source than your transmitter.  This can be something like a
>>>commercial radio, police, fire, etc. <<<

Okay, I'm probably better off getting a 75 Mhz FM then. I hadn't thought
about that but I'm within a half mile of an Interstate highway that has
truckers gabbing 24/7 on their CB's.
Thanks, RM ~
Boat Hull Maker - 15 Jul 2005 10:17 GMT
>>>>AM (Amplitude Modulation) receivers can be overwhelmed by a stronger
>>>>transmission source than your transmitter.  This can be something like a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> truckers gabbing 24/7 on their CB's.
> Thanks, RM ~

75MHz is surface frequency, for car and boat.  This frequency range
offer many choices of frequencies, so less likely to have one in a
nearby distance use the same frequency.  2 guys using the same frequency
will cause lost of control.  I don't remember it exactly, there are
likely 30 frequencies you can choose.  In 27MHz, there are only 12
frequencies you can choose.  In the old days 27MHz have only 6
frequencies.  72MHz is for air.  FM receivers for US has double
superhyterodyne, very reliable but more expansive too.

Combustion type model can have longer running time.  I saw electric boat
modeler bought 10 batteries, can have total of 80 mins running time, 10
battries likely cost 500 US dollar.

I mix glow fuel by myself, each liter cost about 3 US dollar.  Can power
a .21 engine for a few hours.

See these boats, one use electric power(AC motor).
http://www.btorcboat.com/html/picturesByAll.html
Rob Mills - 16 Jul 2005 03:23 GMT
>>>> Combustion type model can have longer running time.  I saw electric
>>>> boat  modeler bought 10 batteries, can have total of 80 mins running
>>>> time, 10  battries likely cost 500 US dollar.<<<<

That's interesting, if I had been betting I would have put my money on the
electric.

>>> I mix glow fuel by myself, each liter cost about 3 US dollar.  Can power
>>> a .21 engine for a few hours.<<<<

Would you mind telling me how this is mixed?

>>> See these boats, one use electric power(AC motor).<<<

These  boats are sort of what I have in mind, the detail is great.  I would
also like to try an air boat. I saw a fellow several years ago who had a 3
wheel air car and I was quite fascinated with it.

Thanks for your input, Rob Mills
Boat Hull Maker - 16 Jul 2005 06:28 GMT
>>>>>Combustion type model can have longer running time.  I saw electric
>>>>>boat  modeler bought 10 batteries, can have total of 80 mins running
>>>>>time, 10  battries likely cost 500 US dollar.<<<<
>
> That's interesting, if I had been betting I would have put my money on the
> electric.

Because of battery cost, I think electric power is expansive.  And too
short running time.

>>>>I mix glow fuel by myself, each liter cost about 3 US dollar.  Can power
>>>>a .21 engine for a few hours.<<<<
>
> Would you mind telling me how this is mixed?

I use 84% methanol, 15% castor oil and 1% acetone.  Use kitchen
measuring cup to do.

Adding niromethane can increase the power, but will increase fuel
consumption too.

Small engine tend to require more castor oil.  Consider the rate of
change of cylinder surface to rate of change of volume.

>>>>See these boats, one use electric power(AC motor).<<<
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks for your input, Rob Mills
Rob Mills - 16 Jul 2005 14:40 GMT
>>>> I use 84% methanol, 15% castor oil and 1% acetone.  Use kitchen
measuring cup to do.<<<<

Thanks, I'll file this info and maybe give it a try

>>> Adding niromethane can increase the power, but will increase fuel
consumption too.<<<<

I used to drag race back in the 50's when drag racing was just catching on.
None of the locals knew anything about nitro when one of them figured it out
and started mixing a dab of nitro in his "B gas class"  Cad powered 54
Oldsmobile, he started smoking the tires the full quarter mile with
times/speeds not far behind the dragsters which at that time were still
struggling to get a time under 10 seconds. We all stood around with our eyes
bugged open wondering what that funny smell was. If I remember right he was
running about 116-17 mph at a tad over 12 seconds.

Thanks again, RM ~
Chuck  Jones - 16 Jul 2005 15:25 GMT
Don't write off the electrics so fast.  New batteries and motors are
allowing this form of propulsion to rival that of internal combustion.
Depending on the application, electric can actually be the better choice.

Years ago I had a Fletcher class destroyer.  It went well over scale speed
on a pair of cheap Radio Shack electric motors.  I used a 4.8 volt 1000 ma
Kraft Radio Receiver Battery to drive the motors.  It lasted a good hour
before recharge.  Imagine what I could do with some of today's newer
batteries?

>>>>> I use 84% methanol, 15% castor oil and 1% acetone.  Use kitchen
> measuring cup to do.<<<<
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks again, RM ~
Henry Springer - 16 Jul 2005 16:19 GMT
>Don't write off the electrics so fast.  

I don't know if it is an issue in the US but in the UK an increasing
numberof model boat lakes won't allow IC engines due to noise /
pollution / insurance risk isssues. Fast and slow electrics and steam
engines (provided a valid boiler certificate is available) are OK.

As to frequency, we suffer from cheap Chinese imports of ready to go
boats (often from ebay) using 35MHz band which is not legal for
surface craft  in UK. We also find similarly sourced aircraft on 40Hz
band, again illegal.
Chuck  Jones - 18 Jul 2005 21:08 GMT
>>Don't write off the electrics so fast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> surface craft  in UK. We also find similarly sourced aircraft on 40Hz
> band, again illegal.

Obviously the UK frequency spectrum is controlled as well as it is here in
the US.  As for the motors?  Usually one can find a pond or such that allows
IC engines.  But you can find a whole lot more that allow electric and sail.
Sign of the times I imagine.
James Moir - 01 Sep 2005 15:08 GMT
We have a 12 foot battleship in the club once held the record for longest
run on a single battery.  It ran for over 24 hours on a car battery.  I also
know someone with a 12 model that runs for 4 hours on a single pack of four
cells.  Depends on motor and current drain!

James Moir

> Don't write off the electrics so fast.  New batteries and motors are
> allowing this form of propulsion to rival that of internal combustion.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >
> > Thanks again, RM ~
C G - 19 Jul 2005 00:04 GMT
>>>>>I use 84% methanol, 15% castor oil and 1% acetone.  Use kitchen
>
>  measuring cup to do.<<<<
>
> Thanks, I'll file this info and maybe give it a try
Be careful, this oil content is low.  The risk is increased damage if
you run it lean.
Doug McLaren - 18 Jul 2005 20:16 GMT
| > Okay, I'm probably better off getting a 75 Mhz FM then. I hadn't thought
| > about that but I'm within a half mile of an Interstate highway that has
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| frequencies you can choose.  In the old days 27MHz have only 6
| frequencies.  72MHz is for air.

I don't know what countries you're talking about, but your IP address
suggests Hong Kong?

Here in the US, there's (still) only 6 27 mHz R/C channels, not 12.
They're probably pretty safe from CB radios a half mile away, unless
somebody is using an illegal amplifier.

But yes, here 72 mHz = air only and 75 mHz = ground only.

| Combustion type model can have longer running time.  I saw electric boat
| modeler bought 10 batteries, can have total of 80 mins running time, 10
| battries likely cost 500 US dollar.

That seems a bit silly.  All he really needs is perhaps four packs and
a few chargers.  It certainly works for the R/C plane guys.

And the packs don't have to cost that much.  You can get low end 6
cell 1500 mAh NiCd subC packs for around $10 US, which probably work
just fine in a boat unless you're racing or doing something where you
need better performance (mostly longer runs.)

(Weight isn't quite the issue in a boat that it is in a plane.  Though
of course it is still a concern.)

| See these boats, one use electric power(AC motor).
| http://www.btorcboat.com/html/picturesByAll.html

To be more precise, it's a brushless motor.  The power going into the
ESC is still DC.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.